Forget planning, put politics first? Priorities for urban management in developing countries

Carole Rakodi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0303-2434(01)85029-7

IF: 7.5

2001-01-01

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Abstract:Traditional approaches to land use planning in developing countries have proved of limited value. These approaches have resulted in the production of ‘paper plans’, while inappropriate policies and standards and problems of enforcement have resulted in the volume of illegal development generally exceeding that of legal development. In addition, where regulations have been enforced, they are seen as having introduced distortions into land and housing markets, which result in higher costs. It is argued that traditional land use planning has, justifiably, been discredited, and should take a share of the blame for illegal development and inadequate service provision. The results for local government include inadequate revenue and, more importantly, a lack of legitimacy in the eyes of urban actors. Without increased legitimacy, the vicious circle of inefficiency and ineffectiveness will continue. The implications of this diagnosis for urban management priorities are discussed, particularly the question of whether, rather than devoting resources to improving the quality of urban spatial plans and development regulation, urban managers should concentrate on governance. The answer to the question is positive, implying that attention must concentrate on governance arrangements, politics and the processes of decision making. Without this, spatial development plans are unlikely to be any more useful than in the past.

remote sensing