The Fast Track Intervention: What Happens Down the River?

Philip C Kendall,Sophie Martel,Marisa Meyer,Dominique S McKnight,Philip C. Kendall,Dominique S. McKnight

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20231021

IF: 17.7

2024-03-03

American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract:Consider the monumental questions in mental health that have been posed by scholars but have lingered unanswered. Can we use research to examine such grand topics? Certainly yes, but not in the unethical ways illustrated in the documentary Three Identical Strangers (1), in which triplets were, without caregiver knowledge or consent, adopted out to families that varied in socioeconomic status. As research methodologists recognize, there are ethical methods to answer such crucial long-range mental health questions. One preferred approach adopts a longitudinal design that examines, often after a quality intervention, the degree to which there are changes "down the river." If the intervention was a treatment, the research question is "Were the treatment effects maintained?" If the intervention was prevention, the question is "Was there a downriver reduction in the rate of the target problem?" Longitudinal follow-ups of 6 or 12 months are helpful. Follow-ups of 2, 3, or 5 years are better. One can argue that if an intervention is truly impactful, it may have effects so profound that subsequent generations are influenced.

psychiatry