Abstract:The BabySeq Project is a study funded by the National Institutes of Health and aimed at exploring the medical, behavioral, and economic impacts of integrating genomic sequencing into the care of both healthy newborns and newborns who are sick. Infants were randomly assigned to receive standard of care or standard of care plus sequencing. The protocol and consent specified that only childhood-onset conditions would be returned. When 1 child was found to carry a BRCA2 mutation despite a negative family history, the research team experienced moral distress about nondisclosure and sought institutional review board permission to disclose. The protocol was then modified to require participants to agree to receive results for adult-onset-only conditions as a precondition to study enrollment. The BabySeq team asserted that their new protocol was in the child’s best interest because having one’s parents alive and well provides both an individual child benefit and a “family benefit.” We begin with a short description of BabySeq and the controversy regarding predictive genetic testing of children for adult-onset conditions. We then examine the ethical problems with (1) the revised BabySeq protocol and (2) the concept of family benefit as a justification for the return of adult-onset-only conditions. We reject family benefit as a moral reason to expand genomic sequencing of children beyond conditions that present in childhood. We also argue that researchers should design their pediatric studies to avoid, when possible, identifying adult-onset-only genetic variants and that parents should not be offered the return of this information if discovered unless relevant for the child’s current or imminent health.

The Strange Tale of Three Identical Strangers: Cinematic Lessons in Bioethics

The Fast Track Intervention: What Happens Down the River?

Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq

Narrating the Infant: A New Look at the Films of James and Joyce Robertson

Fatherlessness, sperm donors and 'so what?' parentage: arguing against the immorality of donor conception through 'world literature'

Parental dreams, dilemmas, and decision-making in cinéma vérité

"She was finally mine": the moral experience of families in the context of trisomy 13 and 18- a scoping review with thematic analysis

Digital twins running amok? Open questions for the ethics of an emerging medical technology

Ultrasound Viewers’ Attribution of Moral Status to Fetal Humans: A Case for Presumptive Rationality

Maternal–Fetal Microchimerism and Genetic Origins: Some Socio-legal Implications

Whose (germ) line is it anyway? Reproductive technologies and kinship

Differential inter-subject correlation of brain activity when kinship is a variable in moral dilemma

A Tale of Three Sisters: A Movie Analysis from Critically Informed Family Therapy Perspective

‘Shadowy objects in test tubes’: A biopolitical critique of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go

Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing

New Sources of Reared Apart Twins; Research Reviews: Female Fitness in Male–Female Twin Pairs, Heritability of Olfactory Thresholds and the Twelfth International Twin Congress; Multiple Birth Conceptions: Rethinking Things; Double Donations

Conjoined Twins Separation Leading to the Death of One Twin: An Expanded Ethical Analysis of Issues Facing the ICU Team

The making and breaking of paternity secrets in donor insemination