Multi-condition M/EEG inverse modeling with sparsity assumptions: how to estimate what is common and what is specific in multiple experimental conditions

Alexandre Gramfort
2010-01-01
Abstract:M/EEG inverse modeling with distributed dipolar source models and penalizations with sparsity inducing norms (e.g. ℓ1 withMCE [1], ℓ0 with FOCUSS [2], ℓ2 − ℓ1 [3]) offer a way to select a set of active dipoles. Indeed, sparsity inducing norms lead to solutions where most of the sources are set to zero and the remaining non zero sources form the set of estimated active dipoles. When running cognitive studies multiple experimental conditions are usually involved and cognitive hypothesis classically consist in quantifying the difference between these conditions. The problem is that when a sparse inverse solver is used independently for each experimental condition, it happens that the selection of dipolar sources is not consistent across conditions, thus limiting further analysis. Even if all conditions share a common dipolar source, due to noise, it can happen that such solvers do not select exactly the same …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?