Abstract:Social comparison is the process of evaluating oneself in comparison with others. People actively or passively, consciously or nonconsciously engage in social comparison. Upward comparison---comparing to better off others, engenders psychological inferiority, while downward comparison---comparing to worse off others, elicits psychological superiority. The purpose of the current research was to explore how such psychological inferiority and superiority information resulted from social comparison would influence others-oriented behavior, namely, prosocial behavior. We postulated that downward comparison could increase people’s empathy towards others, and thus would promote prosocial behavior. Two studies were conducted to test the hypotheses. In Study 1, undergraduates were randomly assigned to the upward comparison, the downward comparison, and the control conditions. In the upward (downward) comparison condition, participants were asked to compare their academic performance with the classmate whose academic performance was ranked the first place (last place) in their major. In the control condition, information aboutacademic performance or comparison was not mentioned. After making the comparison, participants indicated their willingness to help in four hypotheticalscenarios. Empathy, self evaluation, and emotion were measured. In Study 2, we used donation intention as an indicator of prosocial behavior. Rather than asking participants to consciously make upward or downward comparison as in Study1, we manipulated social comparisonbygivingfalse intelligence test feedback. All participants completed a subset of Raven intelligence test. Participants in the upward comparison condition were told that their performance in the test was ranked the bottom 10% of our population. Participants in the downward comparison condition were told their rank was in the top 10%. Those in the control condition did not receive any feedback about the test score. Then we asked participants to read two scenarios and indicate their willingness to donate. Empathy was also measured using the same scale as in Study 1. Results of Study 1 indicated that as compared to the upward comparison condition and the control condition, participants in the downward comparison were more likely to help others. There was no significant difference between those in the upward comparison condition and the control condition. Empathy, rather than emotionorself evaluation, acted as the mediator of this effect. Study 2 further replicated this result, and suggested that those who knew they were better than others showed higher empathic concern for people who needed help, which in turn increased donation intention. In conclusion, downward social comparison would promote prosoical behavior by increasing people’s empathy towards those who need help. This effect was not driven by positive emotionnor enhanced self evaluation, but was mediated by the empathetic feeling.

The influence of social comparison on third-party altruistic behavior

Punish the Perpetrator or Compensate the Victim? Gain vs. Loss Context Modulate Third-Party Altruistic Behaviors

Self-serving reward and punishment: evidence from the laboratory

The effect of third-party intervention on normative behavior of bystanders: An explanation of the social norm cueing effect

Third-Party Punishment or Compensation? It Depends on the Reputational Benefits

Social status affects how third parties assess unfairly shared losses and unfairly shared gains.

Punishment cost affects third-parties' behavioral and neural responses to unfairness

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

Social hierarchies in third-party punishment: A behavioral and ERP study

To Blame or Not? Modulating Third-Party Punishment with the Framing Effect

The sensitivity of third party punishment to the framing effect and its brain mechanism

Neural mechanisms of the mood effects on third-party responses to injustice after unfair experiences

Group environment modulates how third parties assess unfairly shared losses and unfairly shared gains: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations

The source of punishment matters: Third-party punishment restrains observers from selfish behaviors better than does second-party punishment by shaping norm perceptions

Feeling Better and Becoming MoreBenevolent: Impact of Social Comparison on ProsocialBehavior

Group environment promotes the third-party punishment for maintaining social fairness: evidence from ERPs and neural oscillations

Influence of an Individual's Unethical Behaviour on Peers' Vicarious Learning in Organisations: the Role of Moral Anger

Fourth-Party Evaluation of Third-Party Pro-social Help and Punishment: An ERP Study

Time Pressure Weakens Social Norm Maintenance in Third-Party Punishment

The squeaky wheel gets the grease: Recipients' responses influence children's costly third-party punishment of unfairness

Impact of Social Identity Complexity in Unfair Events on Intergroup Bias in Third-Party Fairness Maintenance