Abstract:When confronted with injustice, individuals often intervene as third parties to restore justice by either punishing the perpetrator or helping the victim, even at their own expense. However, little is known about how individual differences in third-party intervention propensity are related to inter-individual variability in intrinsic brain connectivity patterns and how these associations vary between help and punishment intervention. To address these questions, we employed a novel behavioral paradigm in combination with resting-state fMRI and inter-subject representational similarity analysis (IS-RSA). Participants acted as third-party bystanders and needed to decide whether to maintain the status quo or intervene by either helping the disadvantaged recipient (Help condition) or punishing the proposer (Punish condition) at a specific cost. Our analyses focused on three brain networks proposed in the third-party punishment (TPP) model: the salience (e.g., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC), central executive (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dlPFC), and default mode (e.g., dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, dmPFC; temporoparietal junction, TPJ) networks. IS-RSA showed that individual differences in resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) patterns within these networks were associated with the general third-party intervention propensity. Moreover, rs-FC patterns of the right dlPFC and right TPJ were more strongly associated with individual differences in the helping propensity rather than the punishment propensity, whereas the opposite pattern was observed for the dmPFC. Post-hoc predictive modeling confirmed the predictive power of rs-FC in these regions for intervention propensity across individuals. Collectively, these findings shed light on the shared and distinct roles of key regions in TPP brain networks at rest in accounting for individual variations in justice-restoring intervention behaviors.

The effect of third-party intervention on normative behavior of bystanders: An explanation of the social norm cueing effect

Socially Appropriate Intervention: A Cross-Country Investigation of Third-Party Norm Enforcement

The influence of social comparison on third-party altruistic behavior

The source of punishment matters: Third-party punishment restrains observers from selfish behaviors better than does second-party punishment by shaping norm perceptions

Social status affects how third parties assess unfairly shared losses and unfairly shared gains.

Self-serving reward and punishment: evidence from the laboratory

Uncovering individual variations in bystander intervention of injustice through intrinsic brain connectivity patterns

Cross-cultural conceptions of third-party intervention across childhood

Relations Between Actual Group Norms, Perceived Peer Behavior, and Bystander Children's Intervention to Bullying

Social sanctions in response to injunctive norm violations

Group environment modulates how third parties assess unfairly shared losses and unfairly shared gains: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations

Group environment promotes the third-party punishment for maintaining social fairness: evidence from ERPs and neural oscillations

Punishment cost affects third-parties' behavioral and neural responses to unfairness

Personal Norms Predict Defending in Bullying: Mediating Role of Anticipated Pride and Guilt

How Intergroup Relation Moderates Group Bias in Third-Party Punishment

Third party interventions promote cooperation on the interdependent networks: A perspective based on prospect theory

Social norms and cultural diversity in the development of third-party punishment

Influence of an Individual's Unethical Behaviour on Peers' Vicarious Learning in Organisations: the Role of Moral Anger

Punish the Perpetrator or Compensate the Victim? Gain vs. Loss Context Modulate Third-Party Altruistic Behaviors

Fourth-Party Evaluation of Third-Party Pro-social Help and Punishment: An ERP Study

Social hierarchies in third-party punishment: A behavioral and ERP study