Abstract:Acacia thrips are important, overlooked social insects. This paper tests why some Dunatothrips aneurae group members refrain from helping maintain nests. Non‐helpers tended to be partial or non‐breeders, probably too poor quality to breed or help—supporting the longstanding "subfertility hypothesis." They may freeload since nestmates' help confers indiscriminate benefits. Behavioural variation among individuals is a hallmark of cooperative societies, which commonly contain breeders and non‐breeders, helpers and non‐helpers. In some cases, labour is divided with non‐breeders "helping." Conversely, in some societies, subordinate non‐breeders may not help. These individuals may be (i) an insurance workforce ensuring continuity of help for breeders when other helpers are lost, (ii) conserving energy while waiting to breed themselves or (iii) simply of too poor physiological quality either to help or breed. In the Australian Outback, Acacia thrips Dunatothrips aneurae (Thysanoptera) glue Acacia phyllodes into "domiciles" using silk‐like secretions, either alone or cooperatively. Domicile maintenance is important for humidity, so repair can be interpreted as helping. I found that not all females helped to repair damage; some repaired partially or not at all ("non‐helpers"). At the same time, some co‐foundresses are non‐ or partially reproductive ("non‐breeders"), and their role is currently unknown. I first tested the possibility that helping and breeding are divided, with non‐helping females breeding, and non‐breeders helping. In a lab experiment, I rejected this idea. Experimentally damaged domiciles were typically repaired by reproductive females, and less so by non‐ or partially reproductive individuals. To test whether non‐helpers are an insurance workforce, I successively removed repairing females and found that non‐helping females from the same domicile did not increase effort as a result, rejecting this hypothesis. Then I tested whether non‐helpers were conserving energy waiting to breed. In a field experiment, I removed all other females, allowing either a helpful female or a non‐helper to "inherit" her domicile. Isolated like this, non‐helpers laid very few eggs compared to helpers or naturally occurring single foundresses, despite similar ovarian development. My findings show that labour was not divided: reproduction and helping covaried positively, probably depending on individual variation in female quality and intra‐domicile competition. Non‐helping females were neither an insurance workforce nor conserving energy waiting to breed. They are likely simply of poor quality, freeloading by benefiting from domicile maintenance by others. I hypothesize they are tolerated because of selection for indiscriminate communal brood care in the form of domicile repair.

Helping syndrome is partially confirmed in the eusocial naked mole-rat

Pup Recruitment in a Eusocial Mammal—Which Factors Influence Early Pup Survival in Naked Mole-Rats?

Despotic long-tailed macaques benefit others in a group service paradigm

Neuronal, affective, and sensory correlates of targeted helping behavior in male and female Sprague Dawley rats

Foraging associations are related with helping interactions in a cooperatively breeding bird

Group phenotypic composition drives task performances in ants

Personality heterophily and friendship as drivers for successful cooperation

Shared foraging grounds in a solitary rodent: indication for cooperation by kin selection and mutualism?

Neural correlates of ingroup bias for prosociality in rats

Diminishing returns drive altruists to help extended family

A New Paradigm of Learned Cooperation Reveals Extensive Social Coordination and Specific Cortical Activation in Mice

Positive effect of a diggable substrate on the behaviour of a captive naked mole rat colony

Dynamic foraging strategy adaptation to heterogeneous environments contributes to social aggregation in snub-nosed monkeys

Investigating the role of non‐helpers in group living thrips

Within‐group sex ratios predict growth of social mole‐rats

Tube task hand preference in captive hylobatids

Should sons breed independently or help? Local relatedness matters

Instrumental helping motivations of children and chimpanzees

Limited size-related variation in behavioral performance among workers of the exceptionally polymorphic ant Pheidole rhea

Genetic heterogeneity induces nonadditive behavioural changes in Drosophila

Dynamical Models of Task Organization in Social Insect Colonies