On a Hunt for the "True" Septocutaneous Perforator: A Histology Cross-Section Study
Martin Kubat,Zdenek Dvorak,Dusan Zoufaly,Marketa Hermanova,Marek Joukal,Geoffrey G. Hallock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2435-7531
2024-11-07
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Abstract:Background Modern trends in reconstructive surgery involve the use of free perforator flaps to reduce the donor site morbidity. The course of perforator vessels has a great anatomic variability and demands detailed knowledge of the anatomical relationships and the variability of the course of the perforators. The numerous modifications to perforator nomenclature proposed by various authors resulted in confusion rather than simplification. In our study, we focused on the hypothesis that a septocutaneous perforator traverses from the given source vessel to the deep fascia adherent to but not to within the septum itself. Methods Sixty-nine septocutaneous perforators from three different limb donor sites (lateral arm flap, anterolateral thigh flap, and radial forearm free flap) were collected from the gross pathology specimens of 14 fresh cadavers. The gross picture and the cross-sections with the histological cross-sections on different levels were examined to determine the position of the vessel to the septal tissue. Results Of the observed 69 septal perforators, 61 (88.5%) perforators were adherent to but not within the septum. The remaining eight (12.5%) perforators passed through the septum. All these eight perforators were found in multiple different cross-section levels (2 of 19 in lateral arm flap, 3 of 27 in anterolateral thigh flap, and 3 of 23 in radial forearm free flap). Conclusion Although septocutaneous vessels appear identical macroscopically, microscopically two types of vessels with paraseptal and intraseptal pathways are observed. The majority of these vessels are merely adherent to the septum having a paraseptal pathway, while a minority are within the septum and are "true" septocutaneous perforators. It is advisable to dissect with a piece of the septum in order to avoid damage or injury to the perforator. M.K. is the corresponding author and contributed to literature review, flap dissections, writing the manuscript, and data evaluation. D.Z. contributed to flap dissections, writing the manuscript, and evaluation. Z.D. and H.M. contributed to microscopical preparation and evaluation. J.M. contributed to flap dissections and establishment of the ethical protocols from donors. H.G.G. is the coauthor and contributed to literature review, writing the manuscript, correspondence with Prof. Taylor, and evaluation. * Presented in Part at the 12th Congress, World Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore, August 17–19, 2023. Received: 24 June 2024 Accepted: 04 October 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 07 October 2024 Article published online: 05 November 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
surgery