CRMP4 CpG Hypermethylation Predicts Upgrading to Gleason Score ≥ 8 in Prostate Cancer

Xiao-Ping Qin,Qi-Ji Lu,Cheng-Huizi Yang,Jue Wang,Jian-Fan Chen,Kan Liu,Xin Chen,Jing Zhou,Yu-Hang Pan,Yong-Hong Li,Shan-Cheng Ren,Jiu-Min Liu,Wei-Peng Liu,Hui-Jun Qian,Xian-Lin Yi,Cai-Yong Lai,Li-Jun Qu,Xin Gao,Yu-Sheng Xu,Zheng Chen,Yu-Min Zhuo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.840950
IF: 4.7
2022-03-10
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Background This study determined the predictive value of CRMP4 promoter methylation in prostate tissues collected by core needle biopsies for a postoperative upgrade of Gleason Score (GS) to ≥8 in patients with low-risk PCa. Method A retrospective analysis of the clinical data was conducted from 631 patients diagnosed with low-risk PCa by core needle biopsy at multiple centers and then underwent Radical Prostatectomy (RP) from 2014-2019. Specimens were collected by core needle biopsy to detect CRMP4 promoter methylation. The pathologic factors correlated with the postoperative GS upgrade to ≥8 were analyzed by logistic regression. The cut-off value for CRMP4 promoter methylation in the prostate tissues collected by core needle biopsy was estimated from the ROC curve in patients with a postoperative GS upgrade to ≥8. Result Multivariate logistic regression showed that prostate volume, number of positive cores, and CRMP4 promoter methylation were predictive factors for a GS upgrade to ≥8 (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.98, P =0.003; OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.81-5.53, P <0.001; and OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.32-1.55, P <0.001, respectively). The positive predictive rate was 85.2%, the negative predictive rate was 99.3%, and the overall predictive rate was 97.9%. When the CRMP4 promoter methylation rate was >18.00%, the low-risk PCa patients were more likely to escalate to high-risk patients. The predictive sensitivity and specificity were 86.9% and 98.8%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.929 (95% CI: 0.883-0.976; P <0.001). The biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were worse in patients with CRMP4 methylation >18.0% and postoperative GS upgrade to ≥8 than in patients without an upgrade ( P ≤ 0.002). Conclusion A CRMP4 promoter methylation rate >18.00% in prostate cancer tissues indicated that patients were more likely to escalate from low-to-high risk after undergoing an RP. We recommend determining CRMP4 promoter methylation before RP for low-risk PCa patients.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?