STUDYING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF UPVC BUTTERFLY VALVE BY CFD TECHNIQUE
H. Imam,S. K. Pibars,W. Soltan
Abstract:Recently, many butterfly valves made of Unplasticized Polyvinyl Chloride (UPVC) were widely produced, which are differs in its dimension, disc design, and material properties than the commonly used metal ones that affect the hydraulic factors especially the head loss coefficient. Two butterfly valve discs different in geometrical design: thick corrugated type I, and streamlined type II were simulated using CFD technique to inspect the effect of valve disc geometric design and opening angle on pressure difference ∆P between the upstream and downstream and head loss coefficient Kθ. Laboratory tests were performed to the pressure difference measured for the two UPVC butterfly valve types at an average 30 m/h flow rate at disc opening angle θ 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90°. The water flow field past the two UPVC butterfly disc type designs was simulated using SimScale cloud-based platform. Simulation analysis showed that, ∆P was increased by the decease of opening angle from θ 90 to 30° for both two design types of valve disc. The pressure difference ∆P of disc type II was slightly higher than it is in type I at open angle θ degrees 90, and 75, but by decreasing the disc open angle θ60, 45, and 30 the pressure difference of disc type 2 was lower than it is in disc type I. The thick cross section and corrugated design of the disc type I gave a higher flow turbulence resulting in a noticeable pressure difference values than streamlined design of the disc type II specially by decreasing open angle θ60, 45, and 30. There was a high velocity gradient appeared around the edge of the two discs due to the change of disc curvature. The velocity becomes higher between the discs and pipe surface by decreasing the opening angle due to the smaller of flow area. As a result of the difference in ∆P, Kθ was increased by the decease of opening angle from θ 90 to 30° for both two design types of valve disc. The head loss coefficient Kθ1 values ranged from 0.522, to 108.473, where Kθ2 values ranged from 0.144, to 70.285 at different opening angles. The experimental results showed a relatively similar behavior in pressure difference such as the results obtained from CFD analysis for the two disc design types.
Engineering,Materials Science