Abstract:Increasing evidence indicates that gene activation in metazoans is accompanied by deposition of the histone variants H2AZ and H3.3 into promoters and enhancers. The abundance of double variant nucleosomes correlates well with the levels of gene expression. However, knowledge is limited for how variant chromatin is assembled in regulatory regions and, more importantly, whether it plays a direct role in gene activation. To unravel the mechanism, we have recreated activator‐ and HAT‐stimulated transcription from H3.3/H2AZ variant chromatin in HeLa nuclear extracts. We further employed Immobilized template assays to identify variant chromatin specific chromatin proteins. Analysis of preinitiation complex (PIC) revealed that the chromatin remodeling factor EP400 was specifically enriched on variant versus canonical chromatin. In a cell based assay, EP400 was recruited to an integrated inducible promoter in U2OS cells in response to gene activation. Moreover, siRNA knockdown of EP400 led to diminished transcription and reduced assembly of H3.3‐containing chromatin, while having little or no effect on binding of the Mediator co‐activator. Remarkably, this observation was paralleled genome‐wide at promoters and enhancers, where knockdown of EP400 significantly affected H3.3 deposition, but not Mediator recruitment. We investigated the mechanism by in vitro histone exchange assay. EP400 is known to exchange H2AZ for H2A but in biochemical histone exchange assays, it also inserted H3.3 for H3.1 in a nucleosome dependent manner. Interestingly, a side‐by‐side comparison of histone exchange assay indicates that reverse exchange, i.e. exchange of canonical histone into variant chromatin is much less efficient. However, H3.3 exchange into variant chromatin is highly efficient. We reason that this dynamic exchange of H3.3 with H3.3 may play a role in enhaced transcription. What confers this specificity remains an open question. To this end we are currently exploring the contribution of Brd8, a bromodomain containing protein that resides in the same complex and happens to interact directly with EP400. Indeed, we have preliminary evidence from modified histone peptide array experiments that suggest that Brd8‐EP400 duo is significantly enriched in H3K18ac and H3K27ac histone marks. This raises further likelihood of collaboration between EP300 and EP400 in the context of gene activation. Our data support a model in which EP400 links variant chromatin assembly directly to gene activation but downstream of PIC assembly in a pathway parallel to pre‐initiation complex assembly but necessary for transcription on chromatin. Support or Funding Information L.Y. is supported by the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award GM007185

HIRA complex presets transcriptional potential through coordinating depositions of the histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z on the poised genes in mESCs

H2A.Z facilitates access of active and repressive complexes to chromatin in embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation.

Histone H3 Lysine 4 Monomethylation Modulates Long-Range Chromatin Interactions at Enhancers

UBN1/2 of HIRA complex is responsible for recognition and deposition of H3.3 at cis -regulatory elements of genes in mouse ES cells

Histone Chaperone HIRA Complex Regulates Retrotransposons in Embryonic Stem Cells

Histone variants H2A.Z and H3.3 coordinately regulate PRC2-dependent H3K27me3 deposition and gene expression regulation in mES cells

Hira-Dependent Histone H3.3 Deposition Facilitates PRC2 Recruitment at Developmental Loci in ES Cells

PHB Associates with the HIRA Complex to Control an Epigenetic-Metabolic Circuit in Human ESCs

Mechanistic basis of gene regulation by SRCAP and H2A.Z

Two HIRA-dependent pathways mediate H3.3 de novo deposition and recycling during transcription

Histone H3.3 lysine 9 and 27 control repressive chromatin at cryptic enhancers and bivalent promoters

HIRA-dependent provision of histone H3.3 in active chromatin ensures genome compartmentalisation

Chromatin Remodeler EP400 Deposits H3.3 into Promoters and Enhancers During Gene Activation

Histone Variant H2A.Z Regulates Nucleosome Unwrapping and CTCF Binding in Mouse ES Cells

H3.3 deposition counteracts the replication-dependent enrichment of H3.1 at chromocenters in embryonic stem cells

The many faces of H3.3 in regulating chromatin in embryonic stem cells and beyond

Transcription Factor Interaction with COMPASS-like Complex Regulates Histone H3K4 Trimethylation for Specific Gene Expression in Plants

HIRA complex deposition of histone H3.3 is driven by histone tetramerization and histone-DNA binding

Dynamic and decay kinetics of H3 variants in live cells reveal the pivotal role of HIRA/NSD2 in maintaining the distinct H3.3 specific chromatin landscape

HIRA and dPCIF1 coordinately establish totipotent chromatin and control orderly ZGA in Drosophila embryos

HIRA defines early replication initiation zones independently of their genome compartment