Abstract:Compartmentalization of the nucleus into heterochromatin and euchromatin is highly conserved across eukaryotes. Constitutive heterochromatin (C-Het) constitutes a liquid-like condensate that packages the repetitive regions of the genome through the enrichment of histone modification H3K9me3 and recruitment of its cognate reader protein Heterochromatin Protein-1 (HP1a). The ability for well-ordered nucleosome arrays and HP1a to independently form biomolecular condensates suggests that the emergent material properties of C-Het compartments may contribute to its functions such as force-buffering, dosage-dependent gene silencing, and selective permeability. Using an in vitro reconstitution system we directly assess the contributions of H3K9me3 and HP1a on the biophysical properties of C-Het. In the presence of HP1a, H3K9me3 (Me-) and unmodified (U-) chromatin form co-condensates composed of distinct, immiscible domains. These chromatin domains form spontaneously and are reversible. Independently of HP1a, H3K9me3 modifications are sufficient to increase linker-DNA length within chromatin arrays and slow chromatin condensate growth. HP1a increases the liquidity of chromatin condensates while dramatically differentiating the viscoelastic properties of Me- chromatin versus U-chromatin. Mutating key residues in HP1a show that HP1a interactions with itself and chromatin determine the relative interfacial tension between chromatin compartments, however the formation of condensates is driven by the underlying chromatin. These direct measurements map the energetic landscape that determines C-Het compartmentalization, demonstrating that nuclear compartmentalization is a spontaneous and energetically favorable process in which HP1a plays a critical role in establishing a hierarchy of affinities between H3K9me3-chromatin and unmodified-chromatin.

HIRA-dependent provision of histone H3.3 in active chromatin ensures genome compartmentalisation

HIRA defines early replication initiation zones independently of their genome compartment

Two HIRA-dependent pathways mediate H3.3 de novo deposition and recycling during transcription

HIRA vs. DAXX: the two axes shaping the histone H3.3 landscape

HIRA complex presets transcriptional potential through coordinating depositions of the histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z on the poised genes in mESCs

HIRA complex deposition of histone H3.3 is driven by histone tetramerization and histone-DNA binding

H1 histones control the epigenetic landscape by local chromatin compaction

UBN1/2 of HIRA complex is responsible for recognition and deposition of H3.3 at cis -regulatory elements of genes in mouse ES cells

A place for everything and everything in its place: linker histone H1 controls heterochromatic condensation through phase separation

Hira-Dependent Histone H3.3 Deposition Facilitates PRC2 Recruitment at Developmental Loci in ES Cells

Dynamic and decay kinetics of H3 variants in live cells reveal the pivotal role of HIRA/NSD2 in maintaining the distinct H3.3 specific chromatin landscape

HP1a promotes chromatin liquidity and drives spontaneous heterochromatin compartmentalization

Histone Modifications Regulate Chromatin Compartmentalization by Contributing to a Phase Separation Mechanism.

Multiple epigenetic factors co-localize with HMGN proteins in A-compartment chromatin

Chromatin structure-dependent histone incorporation revealed by a genome-wide deposition assay

The histone H3.3 chaperone HIRA is essential for chromatin assembly in the male pronucleus

Structural Insights into the Association of Hif1 with Histones H2a-H2b Dimer and H3-H4 Tetramer

Identification and Characterization of HIRIP3 as a Histone H2A Chaperone

H3K9me3 maintenance on a Human Artificial Chromosome is required for segregation but not centromere epigenetic memory

Multilevel interrogation of H3.3 reveals a primordial role in transcription regulation

H3.3 deposition counteracts the replication-dependent enrichment of H3.1 at chromocenters in embryonic stem cells