Abstract:PURPOSE: This study aims to perform a classification and rigorous numerical evaluation of the risks of occupational exposure in the health environment related to the administration of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment. The study investigates the numerically estimated induced electric field that occurs in the human tissues of an operator caused by exposure to the variable magnetic field produced by TMS during treatments. This could be a useful starting point for future risk assessment studies and safety indications in this context.METHODS: We performed a review of the actual positions assumed by clinicians during TMS treatments. Three different TMS coils (two circular and one figure-of-eight) were modeled and characterized numerically. Different orientations and positions of each coil with respect to the body of the operator were investigated to evaluate the induced electric (-E) field in the body tissues. The collected data were processed to allow comparison with the safety standards for occupational exposure, as suggested by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) 2010 guidelines.RESULTS: Under the investigated conditions, exposure to TMS shows some criticalities for the operator performing the treatment. Depending on the model of the TMS coil and its relative position with respect to the operator's body, the numerically estimated E-field could exceed the limits suggested by the ICNIRP 2010 guidelines. We established that the worst-case scenario for the three coils occurs when they are placed in correspondence of the abdomen, with the handle oriented parallel to the body (II orientation). Working at a maximum TMS stimulator output (MSO), the induced E-field is up to 7.32 V/m (circular coil) and up to 1.34 V/m (figure-of-eight coil). The induced E-field can be modulated by the TMS percentage of MSO (%MSO) and by the distance between the source and the operator. At %MSO equal to or below 80%, the figure-of-eight coil was compliant with the ICNIRP limit (1.13 V/m). Conversely, the circular coil causes an induced E-field above the limits, even when powered at a %MSO of 30%. Thus, in the investigated worst-case conditions, an operator working with a circular coil should keep a distance from its edge to be compliant with the guidelines limit, which depends on the selected %MSO: 38 cm at 100%, 32 cm at 80%, 26.8 cm at 50%, and 19.8 cm at 30%. Furthermore, attention should be paid to the induced E-field reached in the operator's hand as the operator typically holds the coil by hand. In fact in the hand, we estimated an induced E-field up to 10 times higher than the limits.CONCLUSIONS: Our numerical results indicate that coil positions, orientations, and distances with respect to the operator's body can determine the levels of induced E-field that exceed the ICNIRP limits. The induced E-field is also modulated by the choice of %MSO, which is related to the TMS application. Even under the best exposure conditions, attention should be paid to the exposure of the hand. These findings highlight the need for future risk assessment studies to provide more safety information for the correct and safe use of TMS devices.

Acoustic noise generated by TMS in typical environment and inside an MRI scanner

MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis

Acoustic Noise Levels in High-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners

Acoustic Noise of MRI Scans of the Internal Auditory Canal and Potential for Intracochlear Physiological Changes

Double-containment coil with enhanced winding mounting for transcranial magnetic stimulation with reduced acoustic noise

Reduced Auditory Perception and Brain Response with Quiet TMS Coil

MRI gradient coil cylinder sound field simulation and measurement

Acoustic noise reduction in the NexGen 7 T scanner

Modeling the stress and forces on multi-channel TMS coil arrays in high-field MRI scanners

Systematic numerical assessment of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields of transcranial magnetic stimulation

[Simulation study of force and temperature field during transcranial magnetic stimulation application working with magnetic resonance imaging simultaneously]

Comparison of MR coil options for concurrent TMS-fMRI

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper

Auditory Effects of Acoustic Noise From 3‐T Brain MRI in Neonates With Hearing Protection

Improving Patient Comfort in MRI with Predictive Acoustic Noise Cancelling

Parietal double-cone coil stimulation in tinnitus

Ultra-high frequency repetitive TMS at subthreshold intensity induces suprathreshold motor response via temporal summation

Head-to-Head Comparison of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation, Transcranial AC Stimulation, and Transcranial DC Stimulation for Tinnitus

Auditory Fine-Tuned Suppressor of TMS-Clicks (TMS-Click AFTS): A Novel, Perceptually Driven/Tuned Approach for the Reduction in AEP Artifacts in TMS-EEG Studies

Multi-objective optimization method for coil current waveform of transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and extradural electrodes implanted on secondary auditory cortex for tinnitus suppression