Comparison of MR coil options for concurrent TMS-fMRI

Jade B Jackson,Catriona L Scrivener,Marius Mada,Alexandra Woolgar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.15.594454
2024-05-17
Abstract:Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is increasingly being used to study how TMS affects neural processing in local and remote connected brain regions. However, there are many technical challenges that arise when operating this unique combination of techniques. One such challenge is MR head coil compatibility and the image resolution that can be achieved. Here we compare the temporal-signal-to noise-ratio (tSNR) between 3 different MR head coils that can be used with TMS. We show that the 7-channel TMS-dedicated surface coils result in a very high tSNR directly under the TMS and the supplementary coil in comparison to the TxRx and the Magnetica. However, there is low tSNR elsewhere. This field inhomogeneity may not be suitable for all research questions, for example where the aim is to look at distributed neural responses. In these cases, an MR coil with a more homogeneous tSNR such as the Magnetica, may be more appropriate.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly investigates the influence of different types of MR head coils on the experimental effect when using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) simultaneously. Specifically, the study compared three different MR head coils (traditional single-channel TxRx coil, ultra-large 8-channel coil, and two 7-channel surface coils dedicated to TMS) in terms of temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR), which is a commonly used indicator for evaluating image quality. The study found that the 7-channel TMS-dedicated surface coil had very high tSNR at the TMS stimulation site and below the auxiliary coil, but lower tSNR in other regions, indicating inhomogeneity in the field strength. In comparison, the TxRx and Magnetica coils exhibited more uniform tSNR distribution, with the Magnetica coil having higher maximum and average tSNR than the TxRx coil. Therefore, depending on the research objective, if the focus is on the stimulation site and its surrounding area, the TMS-dedicated coil may be a better choice; whereas if studying the whole brain effects away from the stimulation site, the Magnetica coil may be more suitable. Furthermore, the TMS-dedicated surface coil allows for the use of multi-band imaging techniques and neuro-navigation inside the scanner, providing more flexibility. However, it may pose challenges to participant comfort and consistency in coil positioning, and require higher TMS output.