Stimulation Effects Mapping for Optimizing Coil Placement for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Gangliang Zhong,Fang Jin,Liang Ma,Baogui Zhang,Dan Cao,Jin Li,Nianming Zuo,Lingzhong Fan,Zhengyi Yang,Tianzi Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.23.581706

2024-07-12

Abstract:Background: The position and orientation of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil, which we collectively refer to as coil placement, significantly affect both the assessment and modulation of cortical excitability. TMS electric field (E-field) simulation can be used to identify optimal coil placement. However, the present E-field simulation required a laborious segmentation and meshing procedure to determine optimal coil placement. Objective: We intended to create a framework that would enable us to offer optimal coil placement without requiring the segmentation and meshing procedure. Methods: We constructed the stimulation effects map (SEM) framework using the CASIA dataset for optimal coil placement. We used leave-one-subject-out cross-validation to evaluate the consistency of the optimal coil placement and the target regions determined by SEM for the 74 target ROIs in MRI data from the CASIA, HCP15 and HCP100 datasets. Additionally, we contrasted the E-norms determined by optimal coil placements using SEM and auxiliary dipole method (ADM) based on the DP and CASIA II datasets. Results: We provided optimal coil placement in 'head-anatomy-based' (HAC) polar coordinates and MNI coordinates for the target region. The results also demonstrated the consistency of the SEM framework for the 74 target ROIs. The normal E-field determined by SEM was more significant than the value received by ADM. Conclusion: We created the SEM framework using the CASIA database to determine optimal coil placement without segmentation or meshing. We provided optimal coil placement in HAC and MNI coordinates for the target region. The validation of several target ROIs from various datasets demonstrated the consistency of the SEM approach. By streamlining the process of finding optimal coil placement, we intended to make TMS assessment and therapy more convenient. Keywords: Transcranial magnetic stimulation; E-field; stimulation effects mapping; coil placement;

Bioengineering

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the issue of coil placement optimization in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). Specifically:

1. **Background Problem**: The position and orientation of the TMS coil (collectively referred to as coil placement) significantly impact the assessment and modulation of cortical excitability. Current electric field (E-field) simulation methods require time-consuming segmentation and meshing steps to determine the optimal coil placement.

2. **Research Objective**: The paper proposes a new framework—Stimulation Effects Mapping (SEM)—which can provide the optimal coil placement scheme without the need for complex segmentation and meshing processes.

3. **Main Contributions**:
- The SEM framework was constructed using the CASIA dataset, and it provides the optimal coil placement coordinates in both the Head Anatomy-based Coordinate (HAC) system and the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinate system.
- The consistency of the SEM framework was validated through multiple independent datasets (CASIA, HCP15, and HCP100).
- The SEM framework was compared with the Auxiliary Dipole Method (ADM) in terms of E-norm values obtained from different datasets (DP and CASIA II). The results showed that the SEM method yielded larger E-norm values that were more concentrated in the target area.

By simplifying the process of determining the optimal coil placement, this study aims to improve the convenience and accuracy of TMS assessment and treatment.