Challenges in the determination of reactive oxygen species evolving during membrane water electrolysis for in situ ozone production

Roman Grimmig,Philipp Gillemot,Axel Kretschmer,Klaus Günther,Helmut Baltruschat,Steffen Witzleben
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105623
IF: 7
2024-06-16
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Abstract:The treatment of ultrapure water with electrochemically produced O 3 is a common means for disinfection yet leads to the formation of a variety of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The present study draws a comprehensive comparison between three commonly used photometric and fluorometric assays for ROS analysis and quantifies the individual signal responses for dissolved O 3 , ·OH and H 2 O 2 , respectively, to account for cross-sensitivities. By calibrating all combinations of assays and analytes, we developed a quantification procedure to reliably determine the actual ROS composition in ultrapure water environments for different operation conditions of a membrane water electrolyzer with PbO 2 anodes down to concentrations of 0.97 μg L −1 . While the ·OH formation rate can be described linearly over the observed current density range, substantial O 3 evolution is only found for current densities of 0.75 A cm −2 and above (up to 3.7 μmol h −1 for J = 1.25 A cm −2 ). The formation of H 2 O 2 is only observed when an organic carbon source is introduced into the solution. We further quantify the interference of H 2 O 2 with the reading of the oxidation-reduction potential as a common water parameter and elaborate on its validity to monitor the peroxone process when both H 2 O 2 and O 3 are present simultaneously.
engineering, chemical, environmental,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?