The value of axillary, facial, occipital, subclavian and common carotid arteries ultrasound in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis
Joana Martins-Martinho,Matilde Bandeira,Lija James,Ayna Verdiyeva,Tomás Fontes,Ana Rita Lopes,Sofia Naique,Iolanda Velho,Nikita Khmelinskii,Raashid Luqmani,Cristina Ponte
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae321
2024-06-08
Rheumatology
Abstract:Abstract Objective To assess the diagnostic value for GCA in adding the axillary arteries (AX) to the temporal artery (TA) ultrasound, particularly in patients with a cranial phenotype of the disease; and to investigate the utility of facial (FA), occipital (OC), subclavian (SC) and common carotid (CC) ultrasound in patients with suspected GCA. Methods Patients with new-onset GCA and a positive ultrasound of the TA, AX, FA, OC, SC or CC, followed at the rheumatology departments of two academic centres, were retrospectively included. Results Two hundred and thirty patients were assessed. TA halo sign was identified in 206/230 (89.6%) cases, FA in 40/82 (48.8%), OC in 17/69 (24.6%), AX in 56/230 (24.3%), SC in 31/57 (54.4%) and CC in 14/68 (20.6%). Negative TA ultrasound was found in 24/230 (10.4%) patients: 22 had AX involvement, one exclusive OC involvement and one exclusive SC involvement. Adding AX evaluation to the TA ultrasound increased the diagnostic yield for GCA by 9.6%, whereas adding OC or SCs to the TA and AX ultrasound increased it by 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. No value was found in adding the FA or CCs. Notably, 13 patients with cranial symptoms and four with exclusively cranial symptoms showed negative TA ultrasound but positive AX ultrasound. Conclusion Adding the evaluation of AXs to the TA ultrasound increased the number of patients diagnosed with GCA, even in cases of predominantly cranial symptoms. In the subset of patients where these arteries were assessed, no substantial benefit was found in adding the FA, OC, SC or CC arteries to the TA and AX ultrasonographic assessment.
rheumatology