A comparative study of structural variant calling in WGS from Alzheimers disease families

John S Malamon,John J Farrell,Li Charlie Xia,Beth A Dombroski,Rueben G Das,Jessica Way,Amanda B Kuzma,Otto Valladares,Yuk Yee Leung,Allison J Scanlon,Irving Antonio Barrera Lopez,Jack Brehony,Kim C Worley,Nancy R Zhang,Li-San Wang,Lindsay A Farrer,Gerard D Schellenberg,Wan-Ping Lee,Badri N Vardarajan,Malamon,J. S.,Farrell,J. J.,Xia,L. C.,Dombroski,B. A.,Das,R. G.,Way,J.,Kuzma,A. B.,Valladares,O.,Leung,Y. Y.,Scanlon,A. J.,Lopez,I. A. B.,Brehony,J.,Worley,K. C.,Zhang,N. R.,Wang,L.-S.,Farrer,L. A.,Schellenberg,G. D.,Lee,W.-P.,Vardarajan,B. N.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202302181

IF: 5.781

2024-02-29

Life Science Alliance

Abstract:Detecting structural variants (SVs) in whole-genome sequencing poses significant challenges. We present a protocol for variant calling, merging, genotyping, sensitivity analysis, and laboratory validation for generating a high-quality SV call set in whole-genome sequencing from the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project comprising 578 individuals from 111 families. Employing two complementary pipelines, Scalpel and Parliament, for SV/indel calling, we assessed sensitivity through sample replicates (N = 9) with in silico variant spike-ins. We developed a novel metric, D-score, to evaluate caller specificity for deletions. The accuracy of deletions was evaluated by Sanger sequencing. We generated a high-quality call set of 152,301 deletions of diverse sizes. Sanger sequencing validated 114 of 146 detected deletions (78.1%). Scalpel excelled in accuracy for deletions ≤100 bp, whereas Parliament was optimal for deletions >900 bp. Overall, 83.0% and 72.5% of calls by Scalpel and Parliament were validated, respectively, including all 11 deletions called by both Parliament and Scalpel between 101 and 900 bp. Our flexible protocol successfully generated a high-quality deletion call set and a truth set of Sanger sequencing–validated deletions with precise breakpoints spanning 1–17,000 bp.

biology