Abstract:Although consequences of sharing personal information can be negative and severe (e.g., identity theft), individuals still engage in extensive self-disclosures on social networks. One commonly applied explanatory approach is the privacy calculus. Following this, self-disclosures can be conceptualized as rational choices resulting from a weighing of risks and benefits. However, this view misses the additional impulsive nature of decisions. The current study therefore takes the lens of dual-process theories and highlights that self-disclosure decisions can also be guided by an impulsive system. To test for the impact of descriptive social norms, a warning message, privacy-related decision-making styles, and perceived benefits and risks on individuals’ self-disclosure decisions, the fictitious social network “AHOY!” was created. It enabled the measurement of participants’ (N = 551; Mage = 40.77, SDage = 13.93) actual self-disclosures on two decision stages: 1) whether or not a post was created, 2) how much information (on a psychological and informational dimension) was provided. Further, descriptive social norms (i.e., the extent of other users’ self-disclosures) and the presence/absence of a warning message were varied. The remaining factors were measured using questionnaires. The results imply that cognitive and affective processes (expected to be triggered by the investigated factors) are involved differently in the two decision stages. While both the reflective and impulsive system may be involved in the first stage, with the reflective system also potentially taking a predominant role, the impulsive system may be predominant when deciding how much to disclose. This highlights the importance of exceeding common assumptions of rationality to better understand and support individuals’ self-disclosure decisions.

Self-disclosure and attraction: Effects of intimacy and desirability on beliefs and attitudes

Effects of self-disclosure role on liking, closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions

Influence of Self-disclosure in the Acquaintance Process on Changes in People’s Self-concept, How People Feel About Themselves, and How People Feel About Others

Self-Disclosure Valence on Facebook: Effects on Social Attractiveness and User Reactions

Effects of information on interpersonal attraction: Similarity versus affective value.

An Experiment on the Effects of Self-disclosure on Perceived Partner Responsiveness and Intimacy in Zero-Acquaintance Relationships

Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, I Deserve More Than All: Perceived Attractiveness and Self-Interested Behavior

Information processing approaches to interpersonal attraction

Neuroticism, social desirability and anticipations and attributions affecting self-disclosure.

The benefits of turn-taking reciprocal self-disclosure in get-acquainted interactions

Liking and Self-Disclosure in opposite Sex Dyads

The Influence of Personality Traits and Social Networks on the Self-Disclosure Behavior of Social Network Site Users

Unveiling influence: influencer's sensitive self-disclosure and its persuasive impact

Self-disclosure on social networks: More than a rational decision-making process

Self-disclosure and psychological resilience: The mediating roles of self-esteem and self-compassion

Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents' Online Self-Disclosure: Developing and Testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” Model

Expectations and Sexual Desire in Romantic Relationships: An Experimental Investigation of Pleasure and Emotional Closeness Expectancies among Young Adults

He said, she said: Gender differences in the disclosure of positive and negative information

Attachment, Belongingness Needs, and Relationship Status Predict Imagined Intimacy With Media Figures

Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions

To be attractive or to be authentic? How two competing motivations influence self-presentation in online dating