Abstract:INTRODUCTION:Postendoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome (PECS) prevention is one of the common postoperative complications of colorectal ESD. Considering the increasing incidence of PECS, it is critical to investigate various prevention methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transrectal drainage tubes (TDTs) in PECS prevention in patients following colorectal ESD. METHODS:From July 2022 to July 2023, a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 3 hospitals in China. Patients with superficial colorectal lesions ≥20 mm who had undergone ESD for a single lesion were enrolled. Initially, 229 patients were included in the study and 5 were excluded. Two hundred twenty-four were randomly assigned to the TDT and non-TDT group in the end. This open-label study utilized a parallel design with a 1:1 allocation ratio, and endoscopists and patients were not blind to the randomization, and a 24 Fr drainage tube was inserted approximately 10-15 cm above the anus after the ESD under the endoscopy and tightly attached to a drainage bag. The TDTs were removed in 1-3 days following the ESD. RESULTS:A total of 229 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, and 5 patients were excluded. Ultimately, 224 patients were assigned to the TDT group (n = 112) and non-TDT group (n = 112). The median age for the patients was 63.45 years (IQR 57-71; 59 men [52.68%]) in the TDT group and 60.95 years (IQR 54-68; 60 men [53.57%]) in the non-TDT group. Intention-to-treat analysis showed patients in the TDT group had a lower incidence of PECS than patients in the non-TDT group (7 [6.25%] vs 20 [17.86%]; relative risk, 0.350; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.154-0.795; P = 0.008). In the subgroup analysis, TDTs were found to prevent PECS in patients of the female gender (odd ratio, 0.097; 95% CI, 0.021-0.449; P = 0.001), tumor size <4 cm (odd ratio, 0.203; 95% CI, 0.056-0.728; P = 0.011), tumor located in the left-sided colorectum (odd ratio, 0. 339 95% CI, 0.120-0.957; P = 0.035), and shorter procedure time (<45 minutes) (odd ratio, 0.316; 95% CI, 0.113-0.879; P = 0.023). The tube fell off in 1 case (0.89%) accidentally ahead of time. No TDT-related complication was observed. DISCUSSION:The results from this randomized clinical study indicate that the application of TDTs effectively reduced the incidence of PECS in patients after colorectal ESD ( chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2200062164).

Risk factors and a nomogram for prediction of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome for superficial colorectal lesions

Nomogram for predicting electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal tumors

Risk Prediction of Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Coagulation Syndrome

Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study

Association of local steroid injection as a risk factor for electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

A risk prediction model for delayed bleeding after ESD for gastric precancerous lesions

Risk factors for unsuccessful colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms: efficacyand risk factors for malignancy

Prediction of technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial colorectal tumors: a novel clinical score model

A Novel Nomogram for the Prediction of Perforation During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasms

A nomogram to predict stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer

Development and validation of a model to determine the risk of esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal neoplasms

Prediction of Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Esophageal Cancer

Mo1194 PORPHYROMONAS GINGIVALIS PREDICTS LOCAL RECURRENCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

Tu1325 Risk Factors for Postoperative Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Carcinoma

A nomogram and risk classification system predicting esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large area for early esophageal cancer

Development and validation of a predictive model for submucosal fibrosis in patients with early gastric cancer undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection: experience from a large tertiary center

TRANSANAL DRAINAGE TUBE USE FOR PREVENTING POST-ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION COAGULATION SYNDROME IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL LESIONS: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL

Construction and external validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter case–control study

Risk factors and a nomogram for predicting local recurrence in adult patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Risk Factors for Positive Resection Margins after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Esophageal Squamous Carcinomas and Precancerous Lesions