Abstract:Background Blended learning, which combines face-to-face learning and e-learning, has grown rapidly to be commonly used in education. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of this learning approach has not been completely quantitatively synthesized and evaluated using knowledge outcomes in health education. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of blended learning compared to that of traditional learning in health education. Methods We performed a systematic review of blended learning in health education in MEDLINE from January 1990 to July 2019. We independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and compared overall blended learning versus traditional learning, offline blended learning versus traditional learning, online blended learning versus traditional learning, digital blended learning versus traditional learning, computer-aided instruction blended learning versus traditional learning, and virtual patient blended learning versus traditional learning. All pooled analyses were based on random-effect models, and the I2 statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity across studies. Results A total of 56 studies (N=9943 participants) assessing several types of learning support in blended learning met our inclusion criteria; 3 studies investigated offline support, 7 studies investigated digital support, 34 studies investigated online support, 8 studies investigated computer-assisted instruction support, and 5 studies used virtual patient support for blended learning. The pooled analysis comparing all blended learning to traditional learning showed significantly better knowledge outcomes for blended learning (standardized mean difference 1.07, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.28, I2=94.3%). Similar results were observed for online (standardized mean difference 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.86, I2=94.9%), computer-assisted instruction (standardized mean difference 1.13, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.79, I2=78.0%), and virtual patient (standardized mean difference 0.62, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.06, I2=78.4%) learning support, but results for offline learning support (standardized mean difference 0.08, 95% CI –0.63 to 0.79, I2=87.9%) and digital learning support (standardized mean difference 0.04, 95% CI –0.45 to 0.52, I2=93.4%) were not significant. Conclusions From this review, blended learning demonstrated consistently better effects on knowledge outcomes when compared with traditional learning in health education. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to explore the utility of different design variants of blended learning.

Comparison of blended learning and traditional lecture method on learning outcomes in the evidence-based medicine course: a comparative study

Incorporating Modified Team-Based Learning into a Flipped Basic Medical Laboratory Course: Impact on Student Performance and Perceptions

Effectiveness Comparison Between Blended Learning of Histology Practical in Flipped Physical Classrooms and Flipped Virtual Classrooms for MBBS Students.

The Effect of Blended Learning Environment-based, Flipped Classroom Practice on College Students' Learning Performance

Online education isn't the best choice: evidence-based medical education in the post-epidemic era-a cross-sectional study

The effectiveness of blended teaching method based on Canvas platform in the training of evidence-based medicine for postgraduates

Enhancement of Medical Students' Performance and Motivation in Pathophysiology Courses: Shifting From Traditional Instruction to Blended Learning

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of MOOC-based Flipped Learning in College Mental Health Curriculum

Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects of a quasi-experimental study of using flipped classroom approach to teach evidence-based medicine to medical technology students

Comparing the Effects of Blended Learning and Traditional Instruction on “medical Genetics and Embryonic Development” in Undergraduate Medical Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The application of blended teaching in medical practical course of clinical skills training

Assessment of blended biochemistry classes based on massive open online courses and a "semi-flipped" learning environment

Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Application of blended learning approach in clinical skills to stimulate active learning attitudes and improve clinical practice among medical students

Study on the Combination of “Online Open Course” and “Cloud Class” in the Embryology Teaching: a randomized controlled trial

Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course

Implementing a flipped classroom model in an evidence-based medicine curriculum for pre-clinical medical students: evaluating learning effectiveness through prospective propensity score-matched cohorts

Effectiveness evaluation of flipped classroom in emergency medicine online teaching for medical undergraduates

Impacts of blended learning with BOPPPS model on Chinese medical undergraduate students: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 studies

Blended Learning in Basic Medical Laboratory Courses Improves Medical Students’ Abilities in Self-Learning, Understanding, and Problem Solving