Trends and current aspects of reconstructive surgery for gynecological cancers

Matteo Loverro,Alessia Aloisi,Lucia Tortorella,Giovanni Damiano Aletti,Amanika Kumar,Loverro,M.,Aloisi,A.,Tortorella,L.,Aletti,G. D.,Kumar,A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004620

2024-03-04

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Abstract:Gynecologic cancers can lead to gynecologic tract destruction with extension into both the gastrointestinal and urinary tracts. Recurrent disease can also affect the surrounding bony pelvis and pelvic musculature. As opposed to advanced ovarian cancer, where cytoreduction is the goal, in these scenarios, an oncologic approach to achieve negative margins is critical for benefit. Surgeries aimed at achieving a R0 resection in gynecologic oncology can have a significant impact on pelvic anatomy, and require reconstruction. Overall, it appears that these types of radical surgery are less frequently performed; however, when required, multidisciplinary teams at high-volume centers can potentially improve short-term morbidity. There are few data to examine the long-term, quality-of-life outcomes after reconstruction following oncologic resection in advanced and recurrent gynecologic cancers. In this review we outline considerations and approaches for reconstruction after surgery for gynecologic cancers. We also discuss areas of innovation, including minimally invasive surgery and the use of 3D surgical anatomy models for improved surgical planning. In the era of 'less is more', pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology is still indicated when there are no other curative-intent alternatives in persistent or recurrent gynecological malignancies confined to the pelvis or with otherwise unmanageable symptoms from fistula or radiation necrosis. Pelvic exenteration is one of the most destructive procedures performed on an elective basis, which inevitably carries a significant psychologic, sexual, physical, and emotional burden for the patient and caregivers. Such complex ultraradical surgery, which requires removal of the vagina, vulva, urinary tract, and/or gastrointestinal tract, subsequently needs creative and complex reconstructive procedures. The additional removal of sidewall or perineal structures, like pelvic floor muscles/vulva, or portions of the musculoskeletal pelvis, and the inclusion of intra-operative radiation further complicates reconstruction. This review paper will focus on the reconstruction aspects following pelvic exenteration, including options for urinary tract restoration, reconstruction of the vulva and vagina, as well as how to fill large empty spaces in the pelvis. While the predominant gastrointestinal outcome after exenteration in gynecologic oncology is an end colostomy, we also present some novel new options for gastrointestinal tract reconstruction at the end.

oncology,obstetrics & gynecology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the reconstruction issues after gynecological cancer surgery. Specifically, the paper is concerned with how to effectively reconstruct the urinary tract, vulva and vagina after pelvic exenteration, and how to deal with the large cavities in the pelvic cavity. These issues are crucial for improving the patients' postoperative quality of life.

Pelvic exenteration is a very radical surgery, usually used to treat locally advanced or recurrent gynecological malignancies. This surgery not only requires the removal of diseased tissues, but may also involve extensive resection of surrounding normal tissues. Therefore, postoperative reconstruction has become a complex and important part. The paper mentions that although with the development of systemic treatments, such as immunotherapy or targeted therapy, and the progress of low - toxicity radiotherapy techniques, the need for such large - scale destructive surgeries has decreased, but in some cases, pelvic exenteration is still necessary, especially when disease - related symptoms cannot be controlled by other treatment means.

The paper also emphasizes the importance of performing such surgeries in high - volume centers. These centers have professional multidisciplinary teams, which can better manage the patients' peri - operative risks and improve short - term and long - term prognoses and quality of life. In addition, the paper discusses the application of minimally invasive surgical techniques and their potential benefits for patients' recovery, and also explores some innovative methods, such as using 3D surgical anatomical models to optimize surgical planning.

In summary, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis for postoperative reconstruction in gynecological cancers, helping clinicians make decisions when choosing different reconstruction methods, especially in terms of patient selection. This involves not only technical considerations, but also a comprehensive assessment of the individual patient situation.