Does transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex improve implicit motor sequence learning in Parkinson's disease?

Mahyar Firouzi,Kris Baetens,Eva Swinnen,Chris Baeken,Frank Van Overwalle,Natacha Deroost,Frank Van Overwalle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.25311
IF: 4.433
2024-02-24
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Abstract:Transcranial direct‐current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex can facilitate the acquisition of implicit motor sequence learning, particularly in individuals with Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment. Cognitive status seems to be a crucial mediator of tDCS effects on implicit motor sequence learning. Implicit motor sequence learning (IMSL) is a cognitive function that is known to be associated with impaired motor function in Parkinson's disease (PD). We previously reported positive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) on IMSL in 11 individuals with PD with mild cognitive impairments (MCI), with the largest effects occurring during reacquisition. In the present study, we included 35 individuals with PD, with (n = 15) and without MCI (n = 20), and 35 age‐ and sex‐matched controls without PD, with (n = 13) and without MCI (n = 22). We used mixed‐effects models to analyze anodal M1 tDCS effects on acquisition (during tDCS), short‐term (five minutes post‐tDCS) and long‐term reacquisition (one‐week post‐tDCS) of general and sequence‐specific learning skills, as measured by the serial reaction time task. At long‐term reacquisition, anodal tDCS resulted in smaller general learning effects compared to sham, only in the PD group, p = .018, possibly due to floor effects. Anodal tDCS facilitated the acquisition of sequence‐specific learning (M = 54.26 ms) compared to sham (M = 38.98 ms), p = .003, regardless of group (PD/controls). Further analyses revealed that this positive effect was the largest in the PD‐MCI group (anodal: M = 69.07 ms; sham: M = 24.33 ms), p
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?