Abstract:In the current study, N = 42 participants performed a complex serial reaction time task with their lower extremity while they received transcranial direct current stimulation either bilaterally over both dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, over the leg area of the primary motor cortex or received sham stimulation. Groups did not differ regarding their amount of sequence specific learning on the first training day and also not regarding the amount of items they could recall after two consecutive training sessions. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non‐invasive brain stimulation technique which was found to have a positive modulatory effect on online sequence acquisition or offline motor consolidation, depending on the relative role of the associated brain region. Primary motor regions (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFC) have both been related to sequential learning. However, research so far did not systematically disentangle their differential roles in online and offline learning especially in more complex sequential paradigms. In this study, the influence of anodal M1 leg area‐tDCS and anodal DLPFC‐tDCS applied during complex sequential learning (online and offline) was investigated using a complex whole body serial reaction time task (CWB‐SRTT) in 42 healthy volunteers. TDCS groups did not differ from sham tDCS group regarding their response and reaction time (online) and also not in terms of overnight consolidation (offline). Sequence specific learning and the number of recalled items also did not differ between groups. Results may be related to unspecific parameters such as timing of the stimulation or current intensity but can also be attributed to the relative role of M1 and DLPFC during early complex learning. Taken together, the current study provides preliminary evidence that M1 leg area or DLPFC modulation by means of tDCS does not improve complex sequential skill learning. Significance statement Understanding motor learning is helpful to deepen our knowledge about the human ability to acquire new skills. Complex sequential learning tasks have only been studied, sparsely, but are particularly mimicking challenges of daily living. The present study studied early motor learning in a complex serial reaction time task while transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was either applied to leg primary motor cortex or bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. TDCS did not affect sequential learning, neither directly during performance nor in terms of sequence consolidation. Results provide preliminary information that M1 or bilateral DLPFC modulation does not improve early complex motor learning.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not enhance the effects of motor imagery training of a sequential finger-tapping task in young adults

Investigating the Working Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Comparing the effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex at varying intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults

Robust enhancement of motor sequence learning with 4 mA transcranial electric stimulation

Optimal Combination of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulations and Motor Imagery Interventions

Effect of Long-term Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Glx and GABA: A Pilot Study

Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) on Cognitive-Motor Dual Control Skills

Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances retention of a second (but not first) order conditional visuo-motor sequence

Does transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex improve implicit motor sequence learning in Parkinson's disease?

Timing-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Hand Motor Function in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Study

Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases Bilateral Directed Brain Connectivity during Motor-Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface Control

Complex sequential learning is not facilitated by transcranial direct current stimulation over DLPFC or M1

The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial

Cognitive Training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Abstract TP163: Electrode Montage and Dose of Non-Invasive Stimulation - Considerations for Stroke Recovery Studies

Neural Mechanism Underlying Task-Specific Enhancement of Motor Learning by Concurrent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Site Dependency of Anodal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Reaction Time and Transfer of Learning during a Sequential Visual Isometric Pinch Task

No Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over hMT+ on Motion Perception Learning

Performance in myoelectric pattern recognition improves with transcranial direct current stimulation

Optimizing the Effect of tDCS on Motor Sequence Learning in the Elderly