Abstract:Current biomathematical models of fatigue and performance do not accurately predict cognitive performance for individuals with a priori unknown degrees of trait vulnerability to sleep loss, do not predict performance reliably when initial conditions are uncertain, and do not yield statistically valid estimates of prediction accuracy. These limitations diminish their usefulness for predicting the performance of individuals in operational environments. To overcome these 3 limitations, a novel modeling approach was developed, based on the expansion of a statistical technique called Bayesian forecasting. The expanded Bayesian forecasting procedure was implemented in the two-process model of sleep regulation, which has been used to predict performance on the basis of the combination of a sleep homeostatic process and a circadian process. Employing the two-process model with the Bayesian forecasting procedure to predict performance for individual subjects in the face of unknown traits and uncertain states entailed subject-specific optimization of 3 trait parameters (homeostatic build-up rate, circadian amplitude, and basal performance level) and 2 initial state parameters (initial homeostatic state and circadian phase angle). Prior information about the distribution of the trait parameters in the population at large was extracted from psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) performance measurements in 10 subjects who had participated in a laboratory experiment with 88 h of total sleep deprivation. The PVT performance data of 3 additional subjects in this experiment were set aside beforehand for use in prospective computer simulations. The simulations involved updating the subject-specific model parameters every time the next performance measurement became available, and then predicting performance 24 h ahead. Comparison of the predictions to the subjects' actual data revealed that as more data became available for the individuals at hand, the performance predictions became increasingly more accurate and had progressively smaller 95% confidence intervals, as the model parameters converged efficiently to those that best characterized each individual. Even when more challenging simulations were run (mimicking a change in the initial homeostatic state; simulating the data to be sparse), the predictions were still considerably more accurate than would have been achieved by the two-process model alone. Although the work described here is still limited to periods of consolidated wakefulness with stable circadian rhythms, the results obtained thus far indicate that the Bayesian forecasting procedure can successfully overcome some of the major outstanding challenges for biomathematical prediction of cognitive performance in operational settings.

0084 Differently Worded Questions Do Not Substantially Influence Subject Predictions of Performance

Prediction of Vigilant Attention and Cognitive Performance Using Self-Reported Alertness, Circadian Phase, Hours since Awakening, and Accumulated Sleep Loss

0172 Predictive Relationships Between Baseline and Recovery Sleep and Neurobehavioral Measures During Sleep Deprivation

Paradoxical effects from stimulus density manipulation provide new insight into the impact of sleep deprivation on PVT performance

DIFFERENCES OF OBJECTIVE ALERTNESSAND SUBJECTIVE SLEEPINESS AFTER SLEEP LOSSIN THE EARLY MORNING

Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Performance during a Change Signal Task with Adaptive Dynamics

Using a Single Daytime Performance Test to Identify Most Individuals at High-Risk for Performance Impairment during Extended Wake

0118 Performance on a Computerized Threat Elimination Task in an Animated Environment during Total Sleep Deprivation

Repeated Administration Effects on Psychomotor Vigilance Test Performance

Pupillary instability as an accurate, objective marker of alertness failure and performance impairment

Mismatch between subjective alertness and objective performance under sleep restriction is greatest during the biological night

Can a Shorter Psychomotor Vigilance Task Be Usedas a Reasonable Substitute for the Ten‐Minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task?

0969 Predicting Differences Between Objective and Subjective Sleep Parameters with Mental Health Questionnaires

Comparative utility of instruments for monitoring sleepiness-related performance decrements in the operational environment

Optimization of biomathematical model predictions for cognitive performance impairment in individuals: accounting for unknown traits and uncertain states in homeostatic and circadian processes

0227 Sleep Deprivation Enlarges Inter-stimulus Interval Effect on Vigilant Attention

Impaired performance with acute sleep loss.

Predicting individual differences in response to sleep loss: application of current techniques

0178 Cumulative Effects of Mild Sleep Restriction on Lapses of Attention

Brain Activity Correlates With Cognitive Performance Deterioration During Sleep Deprivation

123 Detrimental effects of acute sleep deprivation on perceptual metacognition