Abstract:Abstract Due to the relative independence from the operational parameters, the linear retention indices (LRIs) are useful tool in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) qualitative analysis. The aim of the current study was to develop a multiple linear regression (MLR) model for the prediction of LRIs as a function of selected molecular descriptors. Liquid injection GC-MS was used for the analysis of Essential oils (Rose, Lavender and Peppermint) separating the ingredients by a semi-standard non-polar stationary phase. As a result, a sum of 103 compounds were identified and their experimental LRIs were derived relying on reference measurements of a standard mixture of n-alkanes (from C8 to C20). As a next step, a set of molecular descriptors was generated for the distinguished chemical structures. Further, a stepwise MLR was applied for the selection of the significant descriptors (variables) which can be used to predict the LRIs. From an exploit set of over 2000 molecular descriptors, it was found that only 16 can be regarded as significant and independent variables. At this point split validation was applied: the identified compounds were randomly divided into training (85%) and validation (15%) sets. The training set (87 compounds) was used to derive two MLR models by applying i) the ‘enter’ algorithm ( R 2 = 0.9960, RMSЕ = 17) and ii) the ‘stepwise’ one ( R 2 = 0.9958, RMSЕ = 17). The predictive power was assessed by the validation set (16 compounds) as follows i) q 2 F1 = 0.9896, RMSE = 25 and ii) q 2 F1 = 0.9886, RMSE = 26, respectively. The adequateness of both regression approaches was further evaluated. Newly developed headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) procedures in combination with GC-MS were used for an alternative analysis of the studied Essential oils. Twelve additional compounds, not previously detected by the liquid sample introduction mode of analysis, were identified for which the values of the significant descriptors were within the working range of the developed MLRs. For the last compounds, the LRIs were calculated and the experimental data was used as an external set for assessment of the regression models. The predictive power for both regression approaches was assessed as follows: Enter RMSE = 41, q 2 F2 = 0.9503 and Stepwise RMSE = 40, q 2 F2 = 0.9521.

Weighing paper‐assisted magnetic ionic liquid headspace single‐drop microextraction using microwave distillation followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the determination of essential oil components in lavender

Rapid Analysis of the Essential Oil Components in Dried Lavender by Magnetic Microsphere-Assisted Microwave Distillation Coupled with HS-SPME Followed by GC-MS

Simultaneous Determination of Seven Components of Volatile Oil in Elsholtzia Blanda by Headspace Gas Chromatography

Chemometric Identification of Volatile Components in Essential Oils Extracted from Sweet Orange Peels by Different Methods

Gas Chromatography–mass Spectrometry Following Microwave Distillation and Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction for Fast Analysis of Essential Oil in Dry Traditional Chinese Medicine

Application of Ionic Liquids Based Microwave-Assisted Simultaneous Extraction of Carnosic Acid, Rosmarinic Acid and Essential Oil from Rosmarinus Officinalis

Rapid determination of volatile constituents in safflower by microwave distillation and simultaneous solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Comparative Study of Extraction Methods of Rose Flower Essential Oil

Headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the analysis of lavender's essential oil: Optimization by response surface methodology

Development of a Headspace Solid‐Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry Method to Study Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Emitted by Lavender Roots

Development of Gas Chromatography–mass Spectrometry Following Microwave Distillation and Simultaneous Headspace Single-Drop Microextraction for Fast Determination of Volatile Fraction in Chinese Herb

Development of microwave-assisted extraction followed by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for quantification of camphor and borneol in Flos Chrysanthemi Indici.

Rapid determination of essential oil compounds in Artemisia Selengensis Turcz by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with microwave distillation and simultaneous solid-phase microextraction

Separation of essential oil from fresh leaves of Phellodendron amurense rupr. By solvent-free microwave-assisted distillation with the addition of lithium salts

GC–MS Analysis of the Essential Oils of Piper Nigrum L. and Piper Longum L.

Determination of essential oil in a traditional Chinese medicine, Fructus amomi by pressurized hot water extraction followed by liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Headspace – Solid phase microextraction vs liquid injection GC-MS analysis of essential oils: Prediction of linear retention indices by multiple linear regression

A Simple, Fast, Solvent-Free Method for the Determination of Volatile Compounds in Magnolia Grandiflora Linn

Microwave Hydrodistillation Based on Deep Eutectic Solvent for Extraction and Analysis of Essential Oil from Three Amomum Species Using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Study of Extraction and Cutting of Lavender Oil

Aroma Characteristics of Lavender Extract and Essential Oil from Lavandula angustifolia Mill