Abstract:Background: Longitudinal matching can mitigate confounding in observational, real-world studies of time-dependent treatments. To date, these methods have required iterative, manual re-specifications to achieve covariate balance. We propose a longitudinal extension of genetic matching, a machine learning approach that automates balancing of covariate histories. We examine performance by comparing the proposed extension against baseline propensity score matching and time-dependent propensity score matching. Methods: To evaluate comparative performance, we developed a Monte Carlo simulation framework that reflects a static treatment assigned at multiple time points. Data generation considers a treatment assignment model, a continuous outcome model, and underlying covariates. In simulation, we generated 1,000 datasets, each consisting of 1,000 subjects, and applied: (1) nearest neighbour matching on time-invariant, baseline propensity scores; (2) sequential risk set matching on time-dependent propensity scores; and (3) longitudinal genetic matching on time-dependent covariates. To measure comparative performance, we estimated covariate balance, efficiency, bias, and root mean squared error (RMSE) of treatment effect estimates. In scenario analysis, we varied underlying assumptions for assumed covariate distributions, correlations, treatment assignment models, and outcome models. Results: In all scenarios, baseline propensity score matching resulted in biased effect estimation in the presence of time-dependent confounding, with mean bias ranging from 29.7% to 37.2%. In contrast, time-dependent propensity score matching and longitudinal genetic matching achieved stronger covariate balance and yielded less biased estimation, with mean bias ranging from 0.7% to 13.7%. Across scenarios, longitudinal genetic matching achieved similar or better performance than time-dependent propensity score matching without requiring manual re-specifications or normality of covariates. Conclusions: While the most appropriate longitudinal method will depend on research questions and underlying data patterns, our study can help guide these decisions. Simulation results demonstrate the validity of our longitudinal genetic matching approach for supporting future real-world assessments of treatments accessible at multiple time points.

Longitudinal analysis of gene expression profiles using functional mixed-effects models

Linear mixed effects models for non‐Gaussian continuous repeated measurement data

Mendelian randomization analysis of a time‐varying exposure for binary disease outcomes using functional data analysis methods

Causal Inference using Multivariate Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models with Longitudinal Data

A Dirichlet Process Mixture Model for Clustering Longitudinal Gene Expression Data

Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation

Bayesian profile regression for clustering analysis involving a longitudinal response and explanatory variables

Analysing multiple types of molecular profiles simultaneously: connecting the needles in the haystack

Mixed‐Effect Hybrid Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Dropout

Functional varying index coefficient model for dynamic gene-environment interactions

Linear Mixed-Effects Models for Non-Gaussian Repeated Measurement Data

Functional regression clustering with multiple functional gene expressions

Bayesian Regression Analysis of Data with Random Effects Covariates from Nonlinear Longitudinal Measurements

Classification using functional data analysis for temporal gene expression data

Functional linear regression analysis for longitudinal data

Differential analysis in Transcriptomic: The strength of randomly picking 'reference' genes

Joint Models for Time-to-Event Data and Longitudinal Biomarkers of High Dimension

Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study

Generalized Additive Mixed Modeling of Longitudinal Tumor Growth Reduces Bias and Improves Decision Making in Translational Oncology

Of mice and men: Sparse statistical modeling in cardiovascular genomics

A novel approach for biomarker selection and the integration of repeated measures experiments from two assays