Abstract:Previous research has shown that corruption risks may distort market incentives in high-risk contexts. However, there is a dearth of evidence on the potential impact of corruption in settings characterized by low corruption and high-quality institutions. Against that background, this paper delves deeper into the alleged consequences of corruption by examining the link between corruption risks in public procurement and the profitability of firms in the Swedish construction industry. We introduce a novel measure of corruption risk based on the share of single bidder contracts that a firm has won. Validity analysis confirms that our measure is correlated with an alternative corruption measure and local tender winners. Our results reveal that firms that win many single bidder contracts have higher profitability than other firms in the sector: 10 percentage points higher single bidding rate firms have a 0.2–0.6-percentage-point higher sales margin. The findings underscore that public procurement corruption risks distort markets and economic incentives, and that this risk is present even in low-corruption contexts such as in Sweden.

Court Efficiency and Procurement Performance

Discretion and Supplier Selection in Public Procurement

Judicial Efficiency and Bank Credit to Firms

Experts and arbitration outcomes: Insights from public procurement contract disputes

How judicial efficiency impacts trade credit and doubtful receivables

Buyers' Ability in Public Procurement: A Structural Analysis of Italian Medical Devices

Discretion and public procurement outcomes in Europe*

How 'one-size-fits-all' public works contract does it better? An assessment of infrastructure provision in Italy

On the Judicial Efficiency

Does Judge Turnover Affect Judicial Performance? Evidence from Italian Court Records

Judicial efficiency, debt structure, and cost of debt

Oversight and Efficiency in Public Projects: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis

Intermunicipal cooperation in public procurement

Procuring Medical Devices: Evidence from Italian Public Tenders

Bank Quality, Judicial Efficiency, and Loan Repayment Delays in Italy

Supplier selection and contract enforcement: Evidence from performance bonding

Procuring Survival

Firm performance, imperfect competition, and corruption risks in procurement: evidence from Swedish municipalities

The extra‐legal governance of corruption: Tracing the organization of corruption in public procurement

Discretion and political favoritism: Evidence from two reforms in public procurement