Comparison between Free- and Fixed-Head Pile Group Responses under Lateral Spreading in the Presence of Protection Piles Using Shake Table Tests

Moein Khorashadizadeh,Mir Ali Hosseini,Alireza Saeedi Azizkandi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-9223
IF: 3.918
2024-05-01
International Journal of Geomechanics
Abstract:Many instances of severe damage to pile foundations and pile-supported infrastructures have been caused by liquefaction-induced lateral spreading during major earthquakes, particularly in coastal areas. The current study conducted a series of shaking table experiments to determine the differences between the responses of a free- and a fixed-head group pile under lateral spreading in the presence of finned and circular protection piles. The results indicated that the maximum bending moment tolerated by nonprotected free-head piles was more than that by fixed-head piles. Also, reductions in bending moments were more significant in free-head piles in the presence of protection piles than in fixed-head piles. The bending moments of front and rear piles under restricted pile head conditions were reduced by about 31% and 21%, respectively, when finned piles were used as protection piles, while they were 34% and 42%, respectively, under free-head conditions. Furthermore, modification factors of recommended lateral pressure distribution along a pile per the current design code were determined for the protected and nonprotected free- and fixed-head pile groups of the current study and it was observed that this modification factor (CL) was highly dependent on the location of piles in a group, pile head conditions, and the presence of protection piles in the lateral spreading analysis.
engineering, geological
What problem does this paper attempt to address?