The legal aspects of hotel rate parity

Giuliano Bianchi,Yong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166231190142
IF: 4.5817
2023-08-13
Tourism Economics
Abstract:Tourism Economics, Ahead of Print. This research note delineates the conflict of hotel rate parity and key clauses of competition laws in both Europe and the U.S. We trace the origin of hotel rate parity to the principle of most favored nation (MFN) in international trade agreements. We show that rate parity challenges two pillars of competition law. Under rate parity agreements, it is travel intermediaries—not hotels—that demand rate parity, which comes down to the dominance of travel intermediaries over small and independent hotels. The courts view MFN status as a hindrance to competition and therefore in violation of competition law. The trend and message in Europe are clear: the clause is most likely to be judged as not complying with EU competition law and its national equivalents. In the U.S. though, a lack of case decisions precludes us from reaching any conclusion about the fate of the MFN clause.
economics,hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?