Self-management programs within rehabilitation yield positive health outcomes at a small increased cost compared to usual care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sara Whittaker,Natasha K. Brusco,Keith D. Hill,Nicholas F. Taylor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.007

IF: 4.06

2024-05-11

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract:Objective To determine if self-management programs, supported by a health professional, in rehabilitation are cost-effective. Data Sources Six databases were searched to December 2023. Study Selection Randomised controlled trials with adults completing a supported self-management program while participating in rehabilitation, or receiving health professional input, in the hospital or community settings, were included. Self-management programs were completed outside of structured, supervised therapy and health professional sessions. Included trials had a cost measure and an effectiveness outcome reported, such as health-related quality of life or function. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to determine the certainty of evidence across trials included in each meta-analysis. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERS) were calculated based on the mean difference from the meta-analyses of contributing healthcare costs and quality of life. Data Extraction Following application of the search strategy, two independent reviewers determined eligibility of identified literature, initially by reviewing the title and/or abstract prior to full text review. Using a customised form, data was extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Data Synthesis Forty-three trials were included and 27 had data included in meta-analyses. Where self-management was a primary intervention there was moderate certainty of a meaningful positive difference in quality of life utility index, of 0.03 units (95% CI 0.01 to 0.06). The cost difference between self-management as the primary intervention and usual care (comprising usual intervention/therapy, minimal intervention (including education only), or no intervention), potentially favoured the comparison group (MD AUD130 to AUD3,000, below the acceptable willingness-to-pay threshold in Australia per QALY gained ($50,000/QALY gained). Conclusions Self-management as an intervention is low cost and could improve health-related quality of life. PROSPERO registration CRD42021275472

rehabilitation,sport sciences