Non‐pharmacological interventions on quality of life in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Chang Gao,Xiaomei Li,Fanling Li,Jin Li,Jingjun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12714
2024-03-03
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Abstract:Background Non‐pharmacological interventions have been used in the rehabilitation of stroke survivors, but their effects on stroke survivors' quality of life (QoL) are unknown. Aim This review aimed to summarize the existing evidence regarding non‐pharmacological interventions for QoL in stroke survivors and to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of interventions. Methods We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang data from the earliest available records to March 2023. Randomized controlled trials which explored the effects of non‐pharmacological interventions on QoL in stroke patients were included. The meta‐analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of different interventions on QoL. The Review Manager 5.3 was used to conduct the meta‐analysis and the revised Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of trials. Results A total of 93,245 records were identified, and 34 articles were reviewed and summarized, of which 20 articles were included in the meta‐analysis. The summary of the findings of the included studies revealed fitness training, constraint‐induced movement therapy (CIMT), physical exercise, music therapy (MT), and art‐based interventions may have positive effects on QoL. The fitness training improved total QoL, especially in physical domains including physical functioning (mean difference [MD] = 10.90; 95% CI [7.20, 14.59]), role physical (MD = 10.63; 95% CI [6.71, 14.55]), and global health (MD = 8.76; 95% CI [5.14, 12.38]). The CIMT had a slight effect on general QoL (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.48, 95% CI [0.16, 0.80]), whereas significantly improved strength (MD = 8.84; 95% CI [1.31, 16.38]), activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living (ADL/IADL; MD = 10.42; 95% CI [2.98, 17.87]), and mobility (MD = 8.02; 95% CI [1.21, 14.83]). MT had a positive effect on the mental health domain (SMD = 0.54; 95% CI [0.14, 0.94]). Linking Evidence to Action Our findings suggest that fitness training and CIMT have a significant effect on improving physical QoL, while MT has a positive effect on improving psychological QoL. Future studies may use comprehensive and multicomponent interventions to simultaneously improve the patients' physical, psychological, and social QoL.
nursing