Revisiting metal fluorides as lithium-ion battery cathodes
Xiao Hua,Alexander S. Eggeman,Elizabeth Castillo-Martínez,Rosa Robert,Harry S. Geddes,Ziheng Lu,Chris J. Pickard,Wei Meng,Kamila M. Wiaderek,Nathalie Pereira,Glenn G. Amatucci,Paul A. Midgley,Karena W. Chapman,Ullrich Steiner,Andrew L. Goodwin,Clare P. Grey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00893-1
IF: 41.2
2021-01-21
Nature Materials
Abstract:Metal fluorides, promising lithium-ion battery cathode materials, have been classified as conversion materials due to the reconstructive phase transitions widely presumed to occur upon lithiation. We challenge this view by studying FeF<sub>3</sub> using X-ray total scattering and electron diffraction techniques that measure structure over multiple length scales coupled with density functional theory calculations, and by revisiting prior experimental studies of FeF<sub>2</sub> and CuF<sub>2</sub>. Metal fluoride lithiation is instead dominated by diffusion-controlled displacement mechanisms, and a clear topological relationship between the metal fluoride F<sup>−</sup> sublattices and that of LiF is established. Initial lithiation of FeF<sub>3</sub> forms FeF<sub>2</sub> on the particle's surface, along with a cation-ordered and stacking-disordered phase, A-Li<sub><i>x</i></sub>Fe<sub><i>y</i></sub>F<sub>3</sub>, which is structurally related to α-/β-LiMn<sup>2+</sup>Fe<sup>3+</sup>F<sub>6</sub> and which topotactically transforms to B- and then C-Li<sub><i>x</i></sub>Fe<sub><i>y</i></sub>F<sub>3</sub>, before forming LiF and Fe. Lithiation of FeF<sub>2</sub> and CuF<sub>2</sub> results in a buffer phase between FeF<sub>2</sub>/CuF<sub>2</sub> and LiF. The resulting principles will aid future developments of a wider range of isomorphic metal fluorides.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter