Abstract:Purpose: Patient-specific cutting guides are increasingly used in the field of osteotomies around the knee and can improve the accuracy of planned correction and more specifically in the case of double-level osteotomy (DLO). The purpose of this study was to analyse the accuracy of postoperative coronal alignment after DLO using patient-specific cutting guides techniques (PSI) compared to conventional techniques. The secondary objective was to compare the functional results between the two groups at short-term follow-up. Hypothesis: The accuracy of global correction (HKA angle) is better with patient-specific cutting guides compared to conventional techniques for double-level osteotomy METHODS: This multicentric comparative retrospective study included 53 patients (mean age: 53.8 ± 5.2 years, male/female: 44/9) who underwent a DLO for knee varus malalignment. The coronal correction accuracy (as expressed by the difference between postoperative angular values and preoperative targeted correction) was compared between techniques using patient-specific cutting guides (PSI group, n = 27) or conventional techniques (n = 26) for the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). Postoperatively, the global alignment expressed by the hip-knee-ankle angle and the joint line obliquity were compared between groups. The postoperative functional results for KOOS and UCLA activity scale score were also compared at a mean follow-up of 1.7 years (1.0-3.1 years). Results: No difference was observed for the postoperative global alignment between the PSI and the conventional groups (Δ = 0.6 °, p = 0.11) neither for the postoperative posterior proximal tibial angle (Δ = 1.6°, p = 0,99) or the joint line obliquity (Δ = 0.3°, p = 0,17). In the coronal plane, the postoperative MPTA was lower in the PSI group (Δ = 2.3°, p < 0.001) as well as the postoperative LDFA (Δ = 0.9°, p = 0.01). Concerning correction accuracy in the coronal plane, the results showed a significant higher accuracy of the planned correction in the PSI group compared to the conventional group for MPTA (2.2 ± 0.2 versus 0.8 ± 0.7, Δ = 1.5 °, p < 0.001) and LDFA (1.3 ± 1.0 versus 0.6 ± 0.9, Δ = 0.7°, p < 0.001). No improvement difference was observed between the conventional group and the PSI group respectively for the KOOS symptoms (p = 0.12), the KOOS Pain (p = 0,57), the KOOS activities of daily living (p = 0.61), the KOOS sport/rec (p = 0.65), or for the KOOS Quality of Life (p = 0.99) neither for the UCLA (p = 0.97). Conclusions: This study suggests that the use of custom-made cutting guides improves the accuracy of planned correction in double-level osteotomy compared with conventional techniques, which may have implications particularly in centers not performing a large volume of osteotomies. This improved accuracy is not associated with any difference in joint line obliquity or functional results but these results need to be confirmed by a randomized prospective study. Level of evidence: III; Retrospective comparative study.

'One millimetre equals one degree' is a major source of inaccuracy in planning osteotomies around the knee for metaphyseal deformities compared to the digital planning

Author Reply to “regarding ‘Pre-Surgery Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle and Weightbearing Line Percentage Are Nearly Perfectly Correlated to the Miniaci Angle when Planning Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomies’”

Pre-Surgery Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle and Weightbearing Line Percentage Are Nearly Perfectly Correlated to the Miniaci Angle When Planning Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomies

Surgical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy: coronal equivalence of computer navigation and gap measurement

HKA Angle—A Reliable Planning Parameter for High Tibial Osteotomy: A Theoretical Analysis Using Standing Whole-Leg Radiographs

Accuracy of Bone Resection in MAKO Total Knee Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Angle Accuracy of Intramedullary Bone Resection Guides for Total Knee Arthroplasty

The accuracy of digital templating in the preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasties: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Simultaneous Evaluation of Bone Cut and Implant Placement Accuracy in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty

Double-level osteotomy for varus knees using patient-specific cutting guides allow more accurate correction but similar clinical outcomes as compared to conventional techniques

Influence of lower limb rotation in navigated alignment analysis: implications for high tibial osteotomies

Accuracy of medial-side cutting guide compared to anterior cutting guide in distal femoral osteotomy of total knee arthroplasty

Intra- and inter-operator reliability of three-dimensional preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty

Validation of mediCAD® software for fully digital preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

Error of intraoperative measurement of stem anteversion is decreased by measuring in neutral hip position during total hip arthroplasty

Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Robot-Guided Laser Osteotomy in Reconstruction with Patient-Specific Implants—An Accuracy Study of Digital High-Tech Procedures

The Traditional Intramedullary Axis Underestimates the Medial Tibial Slope Compared to Transmalleolar Sagittal Axis in Image-based Robotic-Assisted Unicompartimental Knee Arthroplasty

Improving the Accuracy of Metatarsal Osteotomies in Minimally Invasive Foot Surgery Using a Digital Inclinometer: Preliminary Study

Predicting translational deformity following opening-wedge osteotomy for lower limb realignment

Accuracy of Combined High Tibial Slope Correction Osteotomy Using 3-Dimensional-Planned Patient-Specific Instrumentation