Abstract:Abstract Background and objectives: Motivated from a study on breast cancer, we consider the problem of evaluating a statistical hypothesis when some model characteristics are potentially non or weakly identifiable from observed data. Such scenarios are common in longitudinal studies for evaluating a covariate effect when dropouts may be informative. The hypothesis related to treatment effects may not be testable nonparametrically, with untestable model restrictions necessary for inference. A popular approach is to assume a finite dimensional model and to fix a minimal set of parameters, called sensitivity parameters, conditional upon which hypothesized parameters are assumed identifiable. These profile models, viewed as a functional of the secondary or sensitivity parameters, form the basis of sensitivity analysis. In the current literature, however, inference regarding significance of the covariates is ad hoc, ignoring that multiple tests are conducted and that the working model may be misspecified. Methods and results: In this paper, we propose conservatively testing the null hypothesis of interest across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic. The test must account for the facts that inferences are carried out simultaneously across the entire range of the sensitivity parameters and that the model may be misspecified under certain values of the sensitivity parameters, as might occur if a nonignorable model is fit, when, in reality, missingness is ignorable. We characterize the limiting distribution of the statistic as a functional of processes in the sensitivity parameters, which involves a careful theoretical analysis of its behavior under model misspecification. In practice, we suggest a simple yet flexible resampling procedure to implement the infimum test as well as to construct confidence bands for simultaneous pointwise tests across all values of the sensitivity parameters. The methodology's practical utility is illustrated in simulations and an analysis of quality-of-life outcomes from a longitudinal study on breast cancer. Interestingly in this example, a covariate effect on cancer outcomes is detected over a wide range of the sensitivity parameter when a Wald test that assumes identifiability fails. Implications and next steps: The key implication of this work is that the hypothesis of interest can be conservatively evaluated across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic over the space of these parameters. A key assumption of this paper is that the working model is finite dimensional although the full specification of distribution of the data is not required. The methodology should be broadly applicable to infinite dimensional models, such as survival models for censored data. This extension is the focus of current research work. Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(10 Suppl):A6.

The generalized order statistics arising from three populations with the lower truncated proportional hazard rate models and its application to the sensitivity to the early disease stage

CASE-CONTROL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS WITH A GENERAL SEMIPARAMETRIC SHARED FRAILTY MODEL - A PSEUDO FULL LIKELIHOOD APPROACH

Subgroup detection and sample size calculation with proportional hazards regression for survival data

Optimality of testing procedures for survival data

Learning from Local to Global - an Efficient Distributed Algorithm for Modeling Time-to-event Data

Estimand-based Inference in Presence of Long-Term Survivors

Statistical Considerations for Evaluating Treatment Effect under Various Non-proportional Hazard Scenarios

Abstract A6: A Global Sensitivity Test for Evaluating Hypotheses with Non- and Weakly Identifiable Statistical Models: an Application to Breast Cancer Outcomes

A bootstrap semiparametric homogeneity test for the distributions of multigroup proportional data, with applications to analysis of quality of life outcomes in clinical trials

Regression Analysis of the Generalized Accelerated Hazards Models With Interval‐Censored Data Under Case‐Cohort Studies

A generalization of moderated statistics to data adaptive semiparametric estimation in high-dimensional biology

Semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation with two-phase stratified case-control sampling

Efficient estimation for left-truncated competing risks regression for case-cohort studies

Covariate-adjusted Group Sequential Comparisons of Survival Probabilities

Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated

Nonparametric inference for competing risks current status data with continuous, discrete or grouped observation times

Testing for an ignorable sampling bias under random double truncation

Risk projection for time-to-event outcome from population-based case–control studies leveraging summary statistics from the target population

Transit-Time Spin Field-Effect-Transistor

A Bayesian adaptive phase III design for multi-arm trials with time-to-event endpoint for nonproportional hazards utilizing the generalized gamma distribution

Causal Inference with Truncation-by-Death and Unmeasured Confounding