Abstract:Structural Equation Models (SEMs) are routinely used in the analysis of empirical data by researchers from different scientific fields such as psychologists or economists. In some fields, such as in ecology, SEMs have only started recently to attract attention and thanks to dedicated software packages the use of SEMs has steadily increased. Yet, common analysis practices in such fields that might be transposed from other statistical techniques such as model acceptance or rejection based on p-value screening might be poorly fitted for SEMs especially when these models are used to confirm or reject hypotheses. In this simulation study, SEMs were fitted via two commonly used R packages: lavaan and piecewiseSEM. Five different data-generation scenarios were explored: (i) random, (ii) exact, (iii) shuffled, (iv) underspecified and (v) overspecified. In addition, sample size and model complexity were also varied to explore their impact on various global and local model fitness indices. The results showed that not one single model index should be used to decide on model fitness but rather a combination of different model fitness indices is needed. The global chi-square test for lavaan or the Fisher's C statistic for piecewiseSEM were, in isolation, poor indicators of model fitness. In addition, the simulations showed that to achieve sufficient power to detect individual effects, adequate sample sizes are required. Finally, BIC showed good capacity to select models closer to the truth especially for more complex models. I provide, based on these results, a flowchart indicating how information from different metrics may be combined to reveal model strength and weaknesses. Researchers in scientific fields with little experience in SEMs, such as in ecology, should consider and accept these limitations.

Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling

The Effect of Latent and Error Non-Normality on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling

The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scale Evaluation

The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data

Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

Model-Selection-Based Approaches to Identifying the Optimal Number of Factors in Multilevel Exploratory Factor Analysis

Evaluating Small Sample Approaches for Model Test Statistics in Structural Equation Modeling

Effects of Latent Variable Nonnormality and Model Misspecification on Testing Structural Equation Modeling Interactions

The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organizational Research and Some Recommended Solutions.

Scale-Invariance, Equivariance and Dependency of Structural Equation Models

Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit

How to evaluate local fit (residuals) in large structural equation models

On the Behavior of Fit Indices for Adjudicating Between Exploratory Structural Equation and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models

A Primer of Model Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling.

Improving measurement-invariance assessments: correcting entrenched testing deficiencies

Assessing Fit in Ordinal Factor Analysis Models: SRMR vs. RMSEA

Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics

The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling

Model-free measurement of case influence in structural equation modeling

How robust are Structural Equation Models to model miss-specification? A simulation study