Abstract:Structural Equation Models (SEMs) are routinely used in the analysis of empirical data by researchers from different scientific fields such as psychologists or economists. In some fields, such as in ecology, SEMs have only started recently to attract attention and thanks to dedicated software packages the use of SEMs has steadily increased. Yet, common analysis practices in such fields that might be transposed from other statistical techniques such as model acceptance or rejection based on p-value screening might be poorly fitted for SEMs especially when these models are used to confirm or reject hypotheses. In this simulation study, SEMs were fitted via two commonly used R packages: lavaan and piecewiseSEM. Five different data-generation scenarios were explored: (i) random, (ii) exact, (iii) shuffled, (iv) underspecified and (v) overspecified. In addition, sample size and model complexity were also varied to explore their impact on various global and local model fitness indices. The results showed that not one single model index should be used to decide on model fitness but rather a combination of different model fitness indices is needed. The global chi-square test for lavaan or the Fisher's C statistic for piecewiseSEM were, in isolation, poor indicators of model fitness. In addition, the simulations showed that to achieve sufficient power to detect individual effects, adequate sample sizes are required. Finally, BIC showed good capacity to select models closer to the truth especially for more complex models. I provide, based on these results, a flowchart indicating how information from different metrics may be combined to reveal model strength and weaknesses. Researchers in scientific fields with little experience in SEMs, such as in ecology, should consider and accept these limitations.

A Primer of Model Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling.

Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Reporting Guidelines

Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood.

Enhancing Model Fit Evaluation in SEM: Practical Tips for Optimizing Chi-Square Tests

Equivalence Testing Based Fit Index: Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual

Impact of Informative Priors on Model Fit Indices in Bayesian Confirmatory Factor Analysis

The Ethical Use of Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling: Recommendations for Psychologists

Parsimony in Model Selection: Tools for Assessing Fit Propensity

Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data

Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit

A literature review of model fit and model comparisons with confirmatory factor analysis: Formalizing the informal in organizational science

On the Behavior of Fit Indices for Adjudicating Between Exploratory Structural Equation and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models

A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling

How robust are Structural Equation Models to model miss-specification? A simulation study

Evaluating Fit Indices for Multivariate t-Based Structural Equation Modeling with Data Contamination

How to evaluate local fit (residuals) in large structural equation models

The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scale Evaluation

Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis: Overfactoring, Underfactoring, and a Program to Guide Interpretation

Performance of Model Fit and Selection Indices for Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling with Missing Data

Bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling: A meta-analytic review of model fit

Beyond ANOVA: An Introduction to Structural Equation Models for Experimental Designs