Seeking big impact from big science

Joe McEntee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/37/02/17

2024-02-01

Physics World

Abstract:Mike Witherell, director of the US Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, tells Joe McEntee why effective stewardship is essential for long-term research success.

physics, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Scientific Impact: Opportunity and Necessity

Marlene Z. Cohen,Gregory L. Alexander,Jean F. Wyman,Nancy L. Fahrenwald,Davina Porock,Mary E. Wurzbach,Susan M. Rawl,Vicki S. Conn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945910365328

2010-08-01

Western Journal of Nursing Research

Abstract:Recent National Institutes of Health changes have focused attention on the potential scientific impact of research projects. Research with the excellent potential to change subsequent science or health care practice may have high scientific impact. Only rigorous studies that address highly significant problems can generate change. Studies with high impact may stimulate new research approaches by changing understanding of a phenomenon, informing theory development, or creating new research methods that allow a field of science to move forward. Research with high impact can transition health care to more effective and efficient approaches. Studies with high impact may propel new policy developments. Research with high scientific impact typically has both immediate and sustained influence on the field of study. The article includes ideas to articulate potential scientific impact in grant applications as well as possible dissemination strategies to enlarge the impact of completed projects.

nursing
The Challenges of Planning for High-Impact Research

Brian L. Foster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.323

2021-04-26

Abstract:In major universities, research must be seen in many dimensions: the different disciplines, basic vs. applied, incremental vs. transformative, disciplinary or interdisciplinary, single researcher or collaborative, and much more. A fundamental difference that receives increasing attention is the distinction between incremental research vs. transformative research. Incremental research takes existing research results to the next step while transformative research opens up whole new ways of framing questions, often challenging what is “known,” and leading to new paths of knowledge creation that could lead to new academic disciplines or completely new approaches to practical issues/problems. Incremental research is critical to bring existing results to their most valuable ends. Transformative research has high impact in opening up new paths to important knowledge, but it poses daunting challenges in being unpredictable, long term, and high risk. Providing appropriate infrastructure is critical for all kinds of research (e.g., facilities, lab space, special equipment, staff support). To assure sustained access to these resources, effective planning is necessary, which poses a significant challenge given the long-term, high-risk, and unpredictable nature of transformative research. To address these planning challenges, it is necessary to explore ways of creating an environment and resources that make successful transformative research more likely to happen rather than planning for incremental research. Such strategies include supporting uniquely powerful facilities that fit with academic strengths (e.g., a strong research reactor, radio-astronomy facility). Another is to maintain a supportive environment for interdisciplinary research. Yet another strategy is to orient performance evaluation away from productivity, which is the enemy of long-term, risky, unpredictable research. And lastly, it is critical to have a positive mindset for challenges to existing knowledge.
The United States Department of Energy and National Institutes of Health Collaboration: Medical Care Advances via Discovery in Physical Sciences

Cynthia Keppel,Andrew Weisenberger,Tatjana Atanasijevic,Shumin Wang,George Zubal,Jeffrey Buchsbaum,Martin Brechbiel,Jacek Capala,Freddy Escorcia,Ceferino Obcemea,Amber Boehnlein,Graham Heyes,Philip Bourne,Simon Cherry,Eric Colby,Georges El Fakhri,Jehanne Gillo,Robert Gropler,Paul Gueye,Georgia Tourassi,Steve Peggs,Craig Woody

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16252

Abstract:Over several months, representatives from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science and National Institutes of Health (NIH) had a number of meetings that lead to the conclusion that innovations in the Nation's health care could be realized by more directed interactions between NIH and DOE. It became clear that the expertise amassed and instrumentation advances developed at the DOE physical science laboratories to enable cutting-edge research in particle physics could also feed innovation in medical healthcare. To meet their scientific mission, the DOE laboratories created advances in such technologies as particle beam generation, radioisotope production, high-energy particle detection and imaging, superconducting particle accelerators, superconducting magnets, cryogenics, high-speed electronics, artificial intelligence, and big data. To move forward, NIH and DOE initiated the process of convening a joint workshop which occurred on July 12th and 13th, 2021. This Special Report presents a summary of the findings of the collaborative workshop and introduces the goals of the next one.
Big questions, big science: meeting the challenges of global ecology

David Schimel,Michael Keller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3236-3

2015-02-15

Oecologia

Abstract:Ecologists are increasingly tackling questions that require significant infrastucture, large experiments, networks of observations, and complex data and computation. Key hypotheses in ecology increasingly require more investment, and larger data sets to be tested than can be collected by a single investigator’s or s group of investigator’s labs, sustained for longer than a typical grant. Large-scale projects are expensive, so their scientific return on the investment has to justify the opportunity cost-the science foregone because resources were expended on a large project rather than supporting a number of individual projects. In addition, their management must be accountable and efficient in the use of significant resources, requiring the use of formal systems engineering and project management to mitigate risk of failure. Mapping the scientific method into formal project management requires both scientists able to work in the context, and a project implementation team sensitive to the unique requirements of ecology. Sponsoring agencies, under pressure from external and internal forces, experience many pressures that push them towards counterproductive project management but a scientific community aware and experienced in large project science can mitigate these tendencies. For big ecology to result in great science, ecologists must become informed, aware and engaged in the advocacy and governance of large ecological projects.

ecology
Should the Endless Frontier of Federal Science be Expanded?

David Baltimore,Robert Conn,William H Press,Thomas Rosenbaum,David N Spergel,Shirley M Tilghman,Harold Varmus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.09614

2021-03-17

Abstract:Scientific research in the United States could receive a large increase in federal funding--up to 100 billion dollars over five years -- if proposed legislation entitled the Endless Frontiers Act becomes law. This bipartisan and bicameral bill, introduced in May 2020 by Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Todd Young (R-IN) and Congressmen Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Mike Gallagher (R-WI), is intended to expand the funding of the physical sciences, engineering, and technology at the National Science Foundation (NSF) and create a new Technology Directorate focused on use-inspired research. In addition to provisions to protect the NSF's current missions, a minimum of 15\% of the newly appropriated funds would be used to enhance NSF's basic science portfolio. The Endless Frontier Act offers a rare opportunity to enhance the breadth and financial support of the American research enterprise. In this essay, we consider the benefits and the liabilities of the proposed legislation and recommend changes that would further strengthen it.

Physics and Society,Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,General Economics,History and Philosophy of Physics,Other Quantitative Biology
Promoting and Supporting Innovation Through Collaborative Research

Jim Gentile

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.26.1_supplement.617.1

2012-04-01

The FASEB Journal

Abstract:Many of the major scientific challenges of the 21st century are likely to require collaborative and interdisciplinary teams. Creating good “team players” who can work synergistically to undertake high‐risk, high‐reward research should be a priority, and demonstrating success in collaborations should be encouraged by private and federal granting agencies, and more highly rewarded by universities in tenure and promotion decisions. Given the challenges that our nation faces, tenure and promotion decisions should no longer be based merely on the number of papers published or overhead dollars generated. Journal editorial boards and foundation peer‐review panels are essential to the highest‐quality science, but they should not be viewed as surrogate members of tenure and promotion committees. Rewarding careers paths should be clearly visible to the nation's newly minted science Ph.D.s, postdoctoral researchers and “tenure track” professors. Allowing these early‐career scientists more expansive opportunities during their most creative years would make the United States, and the academic communities in which they serve, an increasingly more vibrant and creative environments. The heart and soul of American science and enterprise is the willingness to take risks, to learn from failure and to repeat the process until success is achieved. Our early‐career scientists should have the same opportunity.

cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology,biology
Implementing sustainable science in the lab

Kathryn J. Wattam,Matthew A. M. Todd,Anja Groth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-023-01303-9

IF: 21.3

2024-01-01

Nature Cell Biology

Abstract:As cell biologists, we aim to better our communities, but basic research is costly: instruments require energy, experiments consume copious single-use materials. Though governments, international bodies and universities must work to reduce this carbon footprint, we find sustainable research can also be shaped by individual actions in the lab.

cell biology
The Scientific Impact of the Exascale Computing Project

Erik W. Draeger,Andrew Siegel,Steven Gottlieb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2024.3437608

2024-10-09

Computing in Science & Engineering

Abstract:The recent arrival of the Frontier Supercomputer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory officially marked the dawn of the exascale computing era. Its successful deployment coincided with the culmination of the U.S. Department of Energy Exascale Computing Project (ECP), an ambitious, complex, and risky research and development effort that integrated contributions from a broad and diverse subset of the high-performance computing community. The success of ECP will ultimately be judged by the scientific and engineering advances that it enabled. This Special Issue is focused on showcasing early successes in the use of exascale resources to enable breakthroughs in key areas of science in engineering.

computer science, interdisciplinary applications
Who cares about physics today? A marketing strategy for the survival of fundamental science and the benefit of society

Umberto Cannella

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1210.0082

2012-09-29

Popular Physics

Abstract:It would seem that the present dry economic times impose a very precise focus for science in general and physics in particular: research, possibly of applied type. However in doing so two basic pillars of a healthy future for science are being undermined: fundamental research and public engagement. The first is what makes applications possible in the first place, many times with a path from inception to implementation that is as long and indirect as poorly advertised. The second pillar, public engagement, is mostly regarded as a commodity: if there is good level of funding scientists can consider spending money for public relations otherwise this is the first thing scientists cut because it is the least necessary. On the contrary, public engagement in science is very much needed, at the very least because the public is either an enemy or an ally, as testified respectively by the climate change denial and the 2009 Shuttle mission that people wanted in order to service the Hubble Space Telescope for the last time. In this article I will make the case for why popularizing science should be a funding priority, instead of a commodity, for both nation-wide organizations and local research institutions. I will take examples from my personal background with the hope that they will serve to enlighten a more general picture and to frame the discussion around concrete issues and practical avenues to be pursued immediately.
The impact of technology transfer and knowledge spillover from Big Science: a literature review

Deepa Scarrà,Andrea Piccaluga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102165

IF: 12.5

2020-08-01

Technovation

Abstract:<p>Big Science aims to answer fundamental questions regarding our Universe and represents a great example of how science can lead to innovations that generate a positive impact. Big Science has a great deal of scientific, economic, and social relevance. The objective of this study is to better understand how Big Science impacts innovation through transfer mechanisms and spillovers. To accomplish this objective, this study utilizes a thematic approach to review and organize academic research on Big Science. The main themes emerging from the literature are: technology transfer means and mechanisms, procurement relationships with suppliers, collaboration with public and private sectors, IP strategy and policy, impact of large shared facilities and infrastructures, and entrepreneurship as a result of technology transfer and spillover. Finally, we identify directions for future research.</p>

management,operations research & management science,engineering, industrial
How to demonstrate the real-world impact of your research

Martha Newson,Sadie Watson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03059-0

IF: 64.8

2024-10-31

Nature

Abstract:Nature, Published online: 30 October 2024; doi:10.1038/d41586-024-03059-0 Influencing policymakers might not feel like part of a researcher's role. But it should be, argue Martha Newson and Sadie Watson.

multidisciplinary sciences
Impact in psychiatry research through experimentation, translation to industry, policy development and public engagement

Barbara J. Sahakian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114979

IF: 11.3

2022-11-23

Psychiatry Research

Abstract:In this article, I discuss areas where scientists can have impact and that I feel are important for the future of innovative research and societal impacts. Initially, I summarise my research career. I then move on to problem solving, using techniques such as functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology, and new developments, such as the application of the computerised neuropsychological tests CANTAB, which I co-invented. CANTAB was inspired by the need for early detection, pharmacological treatment and neuropsychological understanding of cognitive deficits in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. Finally, I address neuroethical and societal concerns through books, articles and the media and affected UK government policy through the Foresight Project. In future, young scientists hopefully will contribute more time to these important areas of policy development and public engagement.

psychiatry
Importance of Investing in Science and its implications

Wei Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7htq3

2023-01-01

Abstract:Importance of Investing in Science and its implications
Leading US particle-physics lab faces uncertain future

Dan Garisto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00150-4

IF: 64.8

2024-01-26

Nature

Abstract:Several organizations are vying for the contract to manage Fermilab, after it received failing grades from the US Department of Energy. Several organizations are vying for the contract to manage Fermilab, after it received failing grades from the US Department of Energy.

multidisciplinary sciences
Scientists are building a giant 'evidence banks' to create policies that actually work

Helen Pearson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03100-2

IF: 64.8

2024-09-22

Nature

Abstract:Funders launch projects with US 70-million to develop tools that make rapid syntheses of the world's science.

multidisciplinary sciences
Why the US Needs a Deep Domestic Research Facility: Owning rather than Renting the Education Benefits, Technology Advances, and Scientific Leadership of Underground Physics

Kevin T. Lesko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.0402

2013-04-01

Instrumentation and Detectors

Abstract:I summarize the status of the Sanford Underground Research Facility in South Dakota and present connections to Energy and Intensity Frontier that benefit from the establishment of SURF and the staging of US-funded experiments in a domestic facility.
Laboratory Innovations for Sustainable Energy Technologies and Science

Gang Wu,Shaojun Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54227/elab.20220024

2023-01-01

Abstract:Current energy technologies associated with fossil fuels, including coal, natural gas, and petroleum, have been vitally supporting the world’s industrialization, which sustains economic growth and productivity in all countries. However, the sustainability of fossil energy and the significant negative impact on climate change have become essential concerns worldwide. Exploring innovative concepts and approaches to change our traditional energy production and usage is urgent to address energy and environmental sustainability issues.
How to spend one trillion dollars: the US decarbonization conundrum

Peter Christensen,Patrick Baylis,Teevrat v,Shanjun Li,Gordon C. McCord,Erich Muehlegger,Erica Myers,Emma Noble Smith,David S. Rapson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03474-3

IF: 64.8

2024-10-30

Nature

Abstract:Why we must treat decarbonization policies as an experiment and put in place measures now to evaluate what works best. Why we must treat decarbonization policies as an experiment and put in place measures now to evaluate what works best.

multidisciplinary sciences
EVALUATING THE ROLE OF BIG DATA IN U.S. DISASTER MITIGATION AND RESPONSE: A GEOLOGICAL AND BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE

Michael Tega Majemite,Alexander Obaigbena,Michael Ayorinde Dada,Johnson Sunday Oliha,Preye Winston Biu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i2.764

2024-02-06

Engineering Science & Technology Journal

Abstract:Navigating the complex nexus of big data's application in U.S. disaster mitigation and response, this study embarks on an intellectual odyssey to unravel the dynamic interplay between geology and business. Set against the backdrop of an increasingly data-driven world, the research delves into the transformative potential of big data in revolutionizing disaster management paradigms. The expedition of this paper is twofold: to dissect the evolutionary trajectory of big data in the realm of disaster management and to illuminate its economic ramifications and theoretical underpinnings. The scope of this inquiry extends to a meticulous examination of the efficacy of big data in forecasting natural disasters, optimizing disaster response mechanisms and evaluating their economic and environmental impacts. Employing a methodological tapestry woven with qualitative analyses, the study meticulously synthesizes a spectrum of peer-reviewed literature. This scholarly pursuit unveils that big data stands as a beacon of innovation, significantly bolstering the precision of disaster predictions, streamlining response strategies and fortifying economic resilience. The fusion of geological acumen with strategic business insights emerges as a cornerstone in crafting adept disaster management strategies. The crescendo of this scholarly narrative underscores big data as a pivotal catalyst in the metamorphosis of disaster management strategies. The paper advocates for an embracement of big data by policymakers and disaster management aficionados, urging its integration for crafting more resilient, efficient, and sustainable disaster responses. The horizon of future research is marked by a quest to bridge existing gaps, with a clarion call for enhancing real-time disaster responses and predictive prowess. This scholarly discourse offers a prism through which the impact of big data in disaster management is not only understood but also harnessed, providing invaluable insights for academia, policy formulation and practical implementation. Keywords: Big Data, Disaster Management, Predictive Analytics, Geological Insights, Business Strategies, Disaster Resilience.
Advancing Deep Underground Research Through Integration of Engineering and Science

Heping Xie,Chunfai Leung,Jianguo Wang,Xiaozhao Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dug2.12019

2022-01-01

Abstract:Deep underground provides enormous resources for mankind,such as energy,minerals,and water.It can also provide effective solutions for pollutant disposal,such as nuclear waste disposal and CO2 geosequestra-tion,as well as storage spaces.In addition,deep underground is of great necessity because it provides an ultra-quiet environment for scientific research facilities for advanced experiments in physics,chemistry,and medicine.

Seeking big impact from big science

Scientific Impact: Opportunity and Necessity

The Challenges of Planning for High-Impact Research

The United States Department of Energy and National Institutes of Health Collaboration: Medical Care Advances via Discovery in Physical Sciences

Big questions, big science: meeting the challenges of global ecology

Should the Endless Frontier of Federal Science be Expanded?

Promoting and Supporting Innovation Through Collaborative Research

Implementing sustainable science in the lab

The Scientific Impact of the Exascale Computing Project

Who cares about physics today? A marketing strategy for the survival of fundamental science and the benefit of society

The impact of technology transfer and knowledge spillover from Big Science: a literature review

How to demonstrate the real-world impact of your research

Impact in psychiatry research through experimentation, translation to industry, policy development and public engagement

Importance of Investing in Science and its implications

Leading US particle-physics lab faces uncertain future

Scientists are building a giant 'evidence banks' to create policies that actually work

Why the US Needs a Deep Domestic Research Facility: Owning rather than Renting the Education Benefits, Technology Advances, and Scientific Leadership of Underground Physics

Laboratory Innovations for Sustainable Energy Technologies and Science

How to spend one trillion dollars: the US decarbonization conundrum

EVALUATING THE ROLE OF BIG DATA IN U.S. DISASTER MITIGATION AND RESPONSE: A GEOLOGICAL AND BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE

Advancing Deep Underground Research Through Integration of Engineering and Science