Abstract:Recently there is a line of research work proposing to employ Spectral Clustering (SC) to segment (group)\footnote{Throughout the paper, we use segmentation, clustering, and grouping, and their verb forms, interchangeably.} high-dimensional structural data such as those (approximately) lying on subspaces\footnote{We follow~\cite{liu2010robust} and use the term ``subspace'' to denote both linear subspaces and affine subspaces. There is a trivial conversion between linear subspaces and affine subspaces as mentioned therein.} or low-dimensional manifolds. By learning the affinity matrix in the form of sparse reconstruction, techniques proposed in this vein often considerably boost the performance in subspace settings where traditional SC can fail. Despite the success, there are fundamental problems that have been left unsolved: the spectrum property of the learned affinity matrix cannot be gauged in advance, and there is often one ugly symmetrization step that post-processes the affinity for SC input. Hence we advocate to enforce the symmetric positive semi definite constraint explicitly during learning (Low-Rank Representation with Positive Semi Definite constraint, or LRR-PSD), and show that factually it can be solved in an exquisite scheme efficiently instead of general-purpose SDP solvers that usually scale up poorly. We provide rigorous mathematical derivations to show that, in its canonical form, LRR-PSD is equivalent to the recently proposed Low-Rank Representation (LRR) scheme~\cite{liu2010robust}, and hence offer theoretic and practical insights to both LRR-PSD and LRR, inviting future research. As per the computational cost, our proposal is at most comparable to that of LRR, if not less. We validate our theoretic analysis and optimization scheme by experiments on both synthetic and real data sets.

Unsupervised robust discriminative subspace representation based on discriminative approximate isometric embedding

Image retrieval based on incremental subspace learning

Incremental semi-supervised subspace learning for image retrieval.

Constructing the L2-Graph for Robust Subspace Learning and Subspace Clustering

Subspace learning via Locally Constrained A-optimal nonnegative projection.

Robust Subspace Discovery Via Relaxed Rank Minimization

Automatic Subspace Learning via Principal Coefficients Embedding

Robust Subspace Clustering Via Thresholding Ridge Regression

Local Feature Discriminant Projection

Discriminative Subspace Learning With Adaptive Graph Regularization

Robust Recovery of Subspace Structures by Low-Rank Representation

Unsupervised Subspace Learning with Flexible Neighboring

Exploiting Unsupervised and Supervised Constraints for Subspace Clustering

Unsupervised Linear Discriminant Analysis for Jointly Clustering and Subspace Learning

Semi-Supervised Subspace Clustering via Tensor Low-Rank Representation

Compressed Subspace Learning Based on Canonical Angle Preserving Property

Collaborative and Discriminative Subspace Learning for unsupervised multi-view feature selection

Towards robust subspace recovery via sparsity-constrained latent low-rank representation.

Active subspace learning

Comprehensive multi-view self-representations for clustering

Robust Low-Rank Subspace Segmentation with Semidefinite Guarantees