Abstract:Deep multi-view subspace clustering has achieved increasing attention owing to its encouraging ability to address the nonlinear multi-view data. Despite significant progress, most existing deep multi-view subspace clustering methods still suffer from the following drawbacks. First, they usually focus on utilizing the last-level feature from the last encoder layer of the auto-encoder related to each view, yet often overlook exploiting the earlier-level features from the earlier encoder layers as well as integrating the multi-level features from multiple encoder layers. Second, when learning the subspace representation from the self-expressive layer, they rarely consider the cleanliness and robustness of the learned subspace representation. To overcome these drawbacks, this paper proposes a novel clean and robust multi-level subspace representations learning for deep multi-view subspace clustering (CRMSRL). Specifically, the auto-encoder is adopted to nonlinearly map each view into the multi-level features, and then multiple self-expressive layers are added between the encoder layers and their corresponding decoder layers to provide multiple information flow paths through the auto-encoder and learn the multi-level subspace representations corresponding to the multi-level features. Consequently, the intricate hierarchical information embedded in the multi-level features is passed to the corresponding multi-level subspace representations. Moreover, with the idea of robust principal component analysis (RPCA), the learned multi-level subspace representations can be further purified to achieve the cleaner and more robust ones. In addition, to excavate the structural consistency among different views, the common layer is designed to interact with different view-specific self-expressive layers and achieve the high-quality common subspace representation, which can be applied to the spectral clustering algorithm to obtain the final clustering results. Experimental results show that CRMSRL outperforms twelve state-of-the-art baseline methods on six benchmark datasets. In particular, CRMSRL achieves 4.5% improvements on the MSRCV1 dataset in terms of accuracy, compared with the best baseline method.

Comprehensive multi-view self-representations for clustering

Multi-View Clustering Via Simultaneously Learning Shared Subspace And Affinity Matrix

Consistent and Specific Multi-View Subspace Clustering

Multi-view subspace clustering based on adaptive search

Intrinsic Self-Representation for Multi-View Subspace Clustering

Self-representation and matrix factorization based multi-view clustering

Clean and Robust Multi-Level Subspace Representations Learning for Deep Multi-View Subspace Clustering

Generalized Multi-View Collaborative Subspace Clustering

Dual Contrastive Learning for Multi-View Clustering

Salient and consensus representation learning based incomplete multiview clustering

Joint representation learning for multi-view subspace clustering

Exclusivity-Consistency Regularized Multi-view Subspace Clustering

Centralized Joint Sparse Representation for Multi-View Subspace Clustering.

Consistent and diverse multi-View subspace clustering with structure constraint

Robust Kernelized Multiview Self-Representation for Subspace Clustering

Multi-view Clustering Study Based on Subspace.

From Joint Feature Selection and Self-Representation Learning to Robust Multi-view Subspace Clustering.

Fast Self-guided Multi-view Subspace Clustering

Adaptive Latent Representation for Multi-view Subspace Learning.

Tensorized Multi-view Subspace Representation Learning

Seeking commonness and inconsistencies: A jointly smoothed approach to multi-view subspace clustering