Abstract:Background: To evaluate the quality & reliability, technical quality, and readability of patient-targeted online information on idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we searched Google and Bing search engines for the terms “idiopathic intracranial hypertension” and “pseudotumor cerebri.” We evaluated the first 50 search outcomes for each search term. Peer-reviewed articles, targeted advertisements, book chapters, videos, personal blogs, websites intended for healthcare professionals, and non-English websites were excluded. Websites were classified as institutional or private. Two independent reviewers assessed each website for 1) quality and reliability using DISCERN, Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode), and JAMA criteria and 2) technical quality based on 11 criteria. Readability was evaluated using 6 measures (Flesch–Kincaid Reading Ease score and grade level, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (Smog) index, Coleman–Liau index, and automated readability index). Results: Sixty-three websites (37 institutional) were included. The mean scores for the DISCERN, HONcode, and JAMA criteria were 3.6 ± 1 (1–4.8; 1: worse, 5: best), 10.3 ± 2.8 (2–16; 0: worse, 16: best), and 2 ± 1.3 (0–4; 0: worse, 4: best), respectively. The mean technical quality score was 0.8 ± 0.1 (0.5–1). The mean Flesch–Kincaid grade level score was 8.9 ± 1.8 (3.3–13.3). For Flesch–Kincaid grade level, 47 (74.6%) websites scored a grade level of 10 or less. For Gunning Fog Score, 35 websites (55.6%) scored from 7.3 to 10.8. For the Smog Index, 46 (73%) websites scored 5.7–8. The mean Coleman Liau Index was 16 ± 2.1 (9.6–22.2). For the automated readability index, 30 (50.7%) websites scored less than the eighth grade. No statistically significant difference was present between institutional and private websites except for JAMA, which scored higher in private websites (2.4 vs 1.7, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that online information on idiopathic intracranial hypertension/pseudotumor cerebri for patients generally demonstrates moderate to good quality and reliability. Although most websites maintain credible technical quality, the readability exceeds recommended levels for the average American reader. This may impede understanding, emphasizing the need for future improvements.

Assessing the reliability and readability of migraine treatment information on Turkish websites

Quality and reliability analysis of migraine Botox treatment information on YouTube

Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Lessons to be learned when designing comprehensible patient-oriented online information about temporomandibular disorders

The impact of a digital platform on migraine patient-centered outcome research. Evaluation of midolordecabeza.org, a headache website in Spanish

Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on chronic low back pain

Analysis of online information available for treatment of depression

Comprehensiveness of online sources for patient education on otosclerosis

Patient education in the digital age: An analysis of quality and readability of online information on rhinoplasty

Eating attitudes of migraine patients in Turkey: a prospective multi-center study

A Comparative Study of Readability, Acceptability, and the Adaptation of an Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Tinnitus

ChatGPT as an Information Source for Patients with Migraines: A Qualitative Case Study

Evaluation of readability levels of online patient education materials for female pelvic floor disorders

Assessment of the Quality, Accountability, and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Optic Neuritis

Quality of Popular Online Resources About Vestibular Migraine

Revolutionizing migraine management: advances and challenges in CGRP-targeted therapies and their clinical implications

Assessment of The Readability of Online Orthodontic Educational Resources Related To 'Orthodontic Treatment': A Cross-Sectional Study

Comparative assessment of the information available on the treatment of depression over websites in English and Hindi language

Evaluating the Accuracy, Quality, and Readability of Online Breast Cancer Information

Reliability and Validity Study of the Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4 in Turkish

The quality, suitability, and readability of web-based resources on endometriosis-associated dyspareunia: A systematic review