Abstract:Asian welfare economy and social security, whose progressive development has been promoted by industrialization and modernization, show no difference in terms of the objective compared with that of the economic growth and redistribution under the State's domination. It has always been regarded as or expected to be direct contribution to the economic growth. Asian governments are relatively low spenders on social welfare or public expense, which is certainly their advantages, though these mean that there are notable differences in quality and quantity between Asian social welfare and Western social welfare. These also mean that Asian states may go even further on their tracks of social welfare marketization. The modernization in Asia has defined distinctions of Asian welfare from Western welfare in three aspects: (1) Asian welfare policy manifests great harmony with its newly marketized economy. (2) The systemization and continuity of Asian welfare policy is based on sustained economic development and social stability. (3) Being constrained by regional market development and discrepancies among inner religions and cultures, Asian welfare is far poorer in its standard of equity and coverage compared with Western welfare state. Religion and culture mingled, are mingling, and will still mingle, with each other in Asian countries. This has programmed a neutral model for Asian social welfare development, and however, sooner or later Western general and universal welfare economy and social security will surely supersede this neutral model in its developmental trends. Today, liberalism supporters of Western economy, including World Bank and IMF, are all seemly to have changed their view on Asian welfare, and are gradually acknowledging that Asian countries also need to construct perfect welfare states, which should be much more close to the European model in matter of forms. China has formed the scientific viewpoint of development at this right moment; it is quite evident to show that China has gone a further step in defining the developmental objective and direction of its social security and welfare economy.

INDIVIDUALISM, COLLECTIVISM AND THE MARKETIZATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY: Chile and China Compared

Income Gap and Social Equality:The Development Experience of the Social Security Systems in Latin American Region

Citizen Social Right in China:Retrospection,Reality and Suggestion for Policy-making

Social Policymaking and Its Institutional Basis: Transition of the Chinese Social Security System

Understanding Social Security Development: Lessons From the Chinese Case

Public Choice: Analysis Of The Imbalance In Supply And Demand Of Social Security Goods

The Impact of Social Security Policies on Farmland Reallocation in Rural China

How Security Service Responds to the Impact of the Social Security Law (浅谈保安服务业如何应对《社会保险法》实施的冲击)

Social Integration and Theories of Market Transformation

Analysis of the Adaptability of the Level of Social Security and Industrial Restructuring

Perspective on Asian Welfare Economy and Social Security: an East-West Comparison

Does Nonprofit Marketization Facilitate or Inhibit the Development of Civil Society? A Comparative Study of China and the USA

The Social Security Reform in Perspective of Globalization

In the Service of Market Socialism: the Quest for A Welfare Model in China

The Politics of A Socialist Harmonious Society in the Aftermath of China'S Neoliberal Development

Political doctrine, economic growth, and the development of urban social security: Lessons from post-reform China

Life Cycle and Social Security:A Sociological Exploration into the Life Course of Laid-Off and Unemployed Workers

The Great Transformation:Two-way Movement in China since the 1980s

China's "Social Security Miracle": Development Mechanism and Institutional Transformation

Great Social Transformation Afoot in China

Plural Welfare Practice and a Theoretical Framework of Holistic Welfare for China's Transformation