Abstract:Purpose This paper seeks to explore one particular aspect of recent PA research: the apparently widening gap between top academic research and practitioner concerns. This topic was commissioned by the Editor of IJPSM . Evidence of this sliding away from the “real world” is presented. The reasons for it are discussed including Q1 increased measurement, competition and professionalization within academia. Whilst these trends bring significant benefits, a case can nevertheless be made for re-balancing PA research. The purpose of this paper Q2 is to sketch some ways of approaching these trends. Design/methodology/approach This paper was commissioned by the editor. The author has chosen to examine the often-cited gap between academic research and current practitioner concerns. The author has done this using as the author’s main evidence base all the main articles published by the highest impact journals over the years 2015 and 2016. Findings Over the past 30 years more and more of the PA research published in the highest impact journals has become further and further removed from the immediate concerns of practicing administrators and managers. At the same time publication in these journals has become more salient for academic careers. Research limitations/implications Whilst the identified trends bring significant benefits (in terms of increasing professionalization and methodological sophistication) they also carry negative consequences for the historically important dialogue between academics and practitioners. A case can be made for attempting to re-balance PA research. Some ways of approaching this are sketched. Practical implications The academic practitioner dialogue, which, historically, has been vital for academic PA, is currently under some stress. Professionalization and competition within the academic world seem to have widened the gap between the top journals and the “real world.” A case is made that the PA academic community needs to find ways of giving this issue more systematic discussion. Originality/value If the argument is largely correct, then current trends threaten the future of academic PA research. This paper is not the first to identify this threat, but it is one of the first to give it extended consideration and systematically to consider possible causes and remedies.

Avoiding disciplinary garbage cans: a pledge for a problem-driven approach to researching international public administration

Public administration research since 1980: slipping away from the real world?

The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective

An agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries

A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test

The future of critical interdisciplinary accounting research: Performative ontology and critical interventionist research

Public Administration, Context and Innovation: A Framework of Analysis

Opening the “black box” of public administration: The need for interpretive research

Designing resilient institutions for transboundary crisis management : A time for public administration

The Research Method of Public Administration:Question and Reflection

Appraising the philosophical influences on modern public administration research

Theorising Interdisciplinary Public Sector Accounting Research

Unpacking the Global Perspective: Examining NISPAcee Region-Focused Public Administration Research in American Scholarly Journals

Pursuing Consilience: Using Behavioral Public Administration to Connect Research on Bureaucratic Red Tape, Administrative Burden, and Regulation

The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate

The Case for Public Administration with a Global Perspective

A theoretical basis for public sector accrual accounting research: current state and perspectives

Promoting State-of-the-Art Methods in Public Management Research

Organizational Socialization in Public Administration Research: A Systematic Review and Directions for Future Research

Disciplinary Value of China's Public Administration Studies:Reference from Rosenblum's Value Framework

Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory