Abstract:The concept of "major scientific facility" was put forward by Ernest Lawrence, who invented the first cyclotron in 1929. Before Lawrence, all scientific research in the entire world can be said as "small science", which is characterized by the research carried out by individuals or in small size of groups. Since the 1930s, due to the high financial need to build larger accelerators, Lawrence realized that a major scientific research project needs to be completed by a team with people of different expertise. His concept of teamwork has become a tradition in their laboratory at Berkeley and continues to this day. Major scientific facilities can provide ultimate research methods for exploring unknowns, which may likely lead to scientific breakthroughs. Since then, a new trend has gradually emerged in the development of science and technology, that is, every major breakthrough obtained in research, and even a significant step forward, is largely inseparable from installations of large facilities. This is precisely the impetus for countries all over the world to build major scientific facilities with huge investment. The development status of large scientific facilities determines a country's ability to make such breakthroughs in cutting-edge research, and thus determines the country's scientific and technological competitiveness in the world. Through the implementation of the Manhattan Project during the Second World War, the United States was directly benefited from the fact that the remaining facilities at that time all became national laboratories after the war. Following Lawrence's original concept about the teamwork with major scientific facilities, the present article briefly reviews the history and current status of several national laboratories in the United States, and points out that the national-laboratory model can indeed form a strong scientific development impetus and play an international leading role in scientific and technological fields. I take four US national laboratories as examples: The Lawrence-Berkeley National Laboratory, the Argonne National Laboratory, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory, to show that the model, centered on large-scale facilities with the management guaranteed by effective national plans and capital investment, is worthy of in-depth study for reference. In recent years, China has strongly emphasized the importance in the development of scientific research bases and has built a number of key laboratories. It is pointed out that comparing with the standard of the world-leading laboratories, China still needs to narrow the gap in management and in operation.

The strategy behind one of the most successful labs in the world

The benefits of translating biomedical research at drug discovery institutes

A sandbox for prediction and integration of DNA, RNA, and proteins in single cells

How Could Shimadzu Corporation Yield Nobel Prize Winner?

Molecule Maker Lab Institute: Accelerating, advancing, and democratizing molecular innovation

An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials

Trajectories of biomedical research leading to Nobel Prize–winning discoveries

Drug discovery management, small is still beautiful: Why a number of companies get it wrong

Innovations in Molecular Biology-Cutting-Edge Breakthroughs in Molecular Genetics

Synergy between medicinal chemistry and biological research

The advantages of UK Biobank's open‐access strategy for health research

Can single-cell biology realize the promise of precision medicine?

From the pocket accelerator to major scientific facilities

Cancer research must focus on how cancer cells evolve, new UK strategy argues.

Structure Prediction and Computational Protein Design for Efficient Biocatalysts and Bioactive Proteins

Occurrence of ‘Natural Selection’ in Successful Small Molecule Drug Discovery

Innovation and Team Spirit: The Magic of Science Competitions Seen through the Lens of the Compound Challenge

A Pressure Test to Make 10 Molecules in 90 Days: External Evaluation of Methods to Engineer Biology

From competition to cure: the development of live biotherapeutic products for anticancer therapy in the iGEM competition

Unlocking Potential: A Comprehensive Overview of Cell Culture Banks and Their Impact on Biomedical Research

Teaming up: from motors to people