Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

IDEAS: individual level differential expression analysis for single-cell RNA-seq data

A Novel Approach to Detect Differentially Expressed Genes from Count-Based Digital Databases by Normalizing with Housekeeping Genes.

eSVD-DE: cohort-wide differential expression in single-cell RNA-seq data using exponential-family embeddings

Exploiting Aberrant Mrna Expression in Autism for Gene Discovery and Diagnosis

A two-step strategy for detecting differential gene expression in cDNA microarray data

Demultiplexing of single-cell RNA-sequencing data using interindividual variation in gene expression

Bayesian estimation of cell type–specific gene expression with prior derived from single-cell data

Identifying differentially expressed genes in human acute leukemia and mouse brain microarray datasets utilizing QTModel

A Two-Part Mixed Model for Differential Expression Analysis in Single-Cell High-Throughput Gene Expression Data.

IDEIS: a tool to identify PTPRC/CD45 isoforms from single-cell transcriptomic data

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

Data Exploration, Quality Control and Testing in Single-Cell qPCR-Based Gene Expression Experiments

Single-cell differential expression analysis between conditions within nested settings

Design and power analysis for multi-sample single cell genomics experiments

scDEA: differential expression analysis in single-cell RNA-sequencing data via ensemble learning

Differential expression analysis for paired RNA-seq data

Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation

Comparative study on differential expression analysis methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data with small biological replicates: Based on single-cell transcriptional data of PBMCs from COVID-19 severe patients

scINSIGHT for interpreting single-cell gene expression from biologically heterogeneous data

A Reproducibility Focused Meta-Analysis Method for Single-Cell Transcriptomic Case-Control Studies Uncovers Robust Differentially Expressed Genes

Novel Statistical Framework to Identify Differentially Expressed Genes Allowing Transcriptomic Background Differences