A deep learning‐based dual‐omics prediction model for radiation pneumonitis

Liang Bin,Tian Yuan,Su Zhaohui,Ren Wenting,Liu Zhiqiang,Huang Peng,You Shuying,Deng Lei,Wang Jianyang,Wang Jingbo,Zhang Tao,Lu Xiaotong,Bi Nan,Dai Jianrong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15079
IF: 4.506
2021-08-25
Medical Physics
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is the main source of toxicity in thoracic radiotherapy. This study proposed a deep learning-based dual-omics model, which aims to improve the RP prediction performance by integrating more data points and exploring the data in greater depth.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Materials and methods</h3><p>The bimodality data were the original dose (OD) distribution and the ventilation image (VI) derived from 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). The functional dose (FD) distribution was obtained by weighting OD with VI. A pre-trained 3-dimensional convolution (C3D) network was used to extract features from FD, VI and OD. The extracted features were then filtered and selected using entropy-based methods. The prediction models were constructed with 4 most commonly used binary classifiers. Cross validation, bootstrap and nested sampling and methods were adopted in the process of training and hyper-tuning.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Data from 217 thoracic cancer patients treated with radiotherapy were used to train and validate the prediction model. The 4DCT-based VI showed the inhomogeneous pulmonary function of the lungs. More than half of the extracted features were singular (of none-zero value for few patients), which were eliminated to improve the stability of the model. The area under curve (AUC) of the dual-omics model was 0.874 (95% confidence interval: 0.871-0.877), and the AUC of the single-omics model was 0.780 (0.775-0.785, VI) and 0.810 (0.804-0.811, OD), respectively.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>The dual-omics outperformed single-omics for RP prediction, which can be contributed to: 1. using more data points; 2. exploring the data in greater depth; and 3. incorporating of the bimodality data.</p></section>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?