A critique of the NCHS weight for height standard.

T. Cole
Abstract:The use of the NCHS standard to assess weight-for-height in children is equivalent to expressing the child's weight and height, in the ratio W/Hp, as a fraction of the NCHS median W/Hp for age, where the power p of height changes with age. It falls from a value of 3 at birth to 1.5 at 18 months, and then rises to 3 again by 11 years. Its discontinuous pattern of change in the second six months of life leads to potentially misleading assessments of weight-for-height in very tall or very short children. Weight for height standards in general, and the NCHS standard in particular, should not be used to assess weight-for-height in young children. The index W/H2, expressed as a fraction of the NCHS median W/H2 for age, should be used instead. The American growth standard published by the National Center for Health Statistics (Hamill et al. 1978; 1979) differs from several other widely used national standards, e.g. those of Britain and Holland (Tanner et al. 1966; Van Wieringen et al. 1971) in containing a weight for height standard. National standards generally provide reference figures of weight and height for age, but only with the NCHS standard can obesity (or less likely in the Western World, protein-energy malnutrition) be assessed solely from measurements of weight and height. Ideally of course, obesity should be assessed from body fat skinfolds, but they are difficult to measure reproducibly and this approach is not recommended for routine screening (Owen, 1982). The reasons why some studies include a weight for height standard, while others do not, have never been clearly spelt out. There is certainly a need for a simple method to assess overweight or underweight in childhood, which a weight for height standard appears to satisfy. On the other hand, various authors have expressed dissatisfaction with the behavior of weight for height standards in general, and have made efforts to provide alternative indices with better properties (Dugdale, 1971; McClaren and Read, 1975; Rolland-Cachera et al. 1982; Cronk et al. 1982). The authors of the NCHS report (Hamill et al. 1979) themselves say that the weight for height standard assumes age-independence: "... a useful statistical assumption that is not quite true." Against this should be set the one big advantage of the weight for height standard it can be used when children's ages are either unknown or unreliable, as is often the case in the Developing World. XMRC Dunn Nutrition Unit, Downhams Lane, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1XJ, U.K. Human Biology , May 1985, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 183-196. © Wayne State University Press, 1985 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.45 on Thu, 01 Sep 2016 05:02:09 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
What problem does this paper attempt to address?