European Multicenter Evaluation of Commercial Enzyme Immunoassays for Detecting Norovirus Antigen in Fecal Samples
Jim J. Gray,Evelyne Kohli,Franco M. Ruggeri,Harry Vennema,Alicia Sánchez-Fauquier,Eckart Schreier,Chris I. Gallimore,Miren Iturriza-Gomara,Helene Giraudon,Pierre Pothier,Ilaria Di Bartolo,Nadia Inglese,Erwin de Bruin,Bas van der Veer,Silvia Moreno,Vanessa Montero,Marí C. de Llano,Marina Höhne,Sabine M. Diedrich,Alicia Sánchez-Fauquier,Marí C. de Llano,Marina Höhne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.00214-07
2007-10-01
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
Abstract:ABSTRACT A total of 2,254 fecal samples were tested in a European multicenter evaluation of commercially available norovirus antigen detection assays. Two commercial enzyme immunoassays, IDEIA Norovirus (Oxoid; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ely, United Kingdom) and RIDASCREEN Norovirus (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany), were included in the evaluation, and their performance was compared with the results of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Included in the evaluation were samples collected in sporadic cases of gastroenteritis, samples from outbreaks in which two or more samples were collected, well-characterized samples representing genotypes currently cocirculating within Europe, and samples collected from patients with gastroenteritis caused by a pathogen other than norovirus. The sensitivities and specificities of the IDEIA Norovirus and RIDASCREEN Norovirus assays were 58.93 and 43.81% and 93.91 and 96.37%, respectively, compared with RT-PCR. The sensitivities of both assays for outbreak investigations improved when six or more samples from an outbreak were examined. The IDEIA Norovirus assay exhibited reactivity to a broader range of norovirus genotypes than the RIDASCREEN Norovirus assay, which showed genotype-dependent sensitivities. The results indicate that, if used, these assays should serve as screening assays and the results should be confirmed by RT-PCR.