Acoustic emission behaviour during the evolution of a single pit on stainless steels

Yunlong Wu,Jing Nong,Sui Yuan,Qi Guo,Jian Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109308
IF: 7.72
2021-05-01
Corrosion Science
Abstract:<p>The current study investigated the acoustic emission (AE) behaviour of a single pit evolution on two types of stainless steels using small-scaled electrodes. Dozens of AE signals were observed during pitting on 17-4 PH. However, 304 SS was much less acoustically emissive. According to the in-situ optical observation, black flocculent clusters were observed in 17-4 PH during pitting. However, such process was very weak in 304 SS. It was found that the hydrogen bubble formed inside the pit and the perturbation of electrolyte around the pit were able to create AE signals.</p>
materials science, multidisciplinary,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the acoustic emission (AE) behavior and its mechanism during the evolution of a single corrosion pit in stainless steel materials. Specifically, researchers hope to explore the following points through experiments: 1. **Comparison of different materials**: Compare the differences in acoustic emission signals generated during the evolution of a single corrosion pit between two different types of stainless steel (17 - 4 PH and 304 SS). 2. **Sources of acoustic emission signals**: Explore the specific sources of acoustic emission signals, especially the influence of hydrogen bubble formation, release, and electrolyte perturbation on acoustic emission signals. 3. **Improvement of experimental methods**: By using the small - scale electrode method to limit the area of the exposed metal surface, reduce the interference of multiple corrosion pits developing simultaneously, and thus more accurately study the evolution process of a single corrosion pit. ### Main research contents - **Experimental design**: Use a specific experimental device, combined with acoustic emission technology, optical microscopy, and electrochemical testing methods to study the evolution process of a single corrosion pit on stainless steel materials. - **Material selection**: Two stainless steel materials, 17 - 4 PH and 304 SS, were selected for comparative study. - **Experimental methods**: - **Anodic polarization experiment**: Trigger the formation of corrosion pits through anodic polarization and record acoustic emission signals. - **Cathodic polarization experiment**: Observe the formation and release of hydrogen bubbles through cathodic polarization and record acoustic emission signals. - **Artificial perturbation experiment**: Introduce solution perturbation through the liquid - flow circulation system and observe its influence on acoustic emission signals. ### Research objectives - **Understand the generation mechanism of acoustic emission signals**: Analyze the influence of factors such as hydrogen bubble formation and release and electrolyte perturbation on acoustic emission signals through experimental data. - **Compare the acoustic emission characteristics of different materials**: Explore why 17 - 4 PH generates more acoustic emission signals during the corrosion process, while 304 SS generates fewer. - **Optimize experimental methods**: Improve the accuracy and reliability of experimental results through the small - scale electrode method. ### Experimental results - **17 - 4 PH**: During the anodic polarization process, a large number of acoustic emission signals were observed, especially when hydrogen bubbles were formed and released. Black flocs were observed spraying out from the corrosion pits by optical microscopy. - **304 SS**: Almost no acoustic emission signals were detected during the anodic polarization process, even when hydrogen bubbles were formed and released. Fewer corrosion products were observed by optical microscopy, and no obvious hydrogen bubble formation was observed. - **Cathodic polarization experiment**: The formation and release of hydrogen bubbles were observed on both 17 - 4 PH and 304 SS, but 17 - 4 PH generated more acoustic emission signals. ### Conclusions - **The formation and release of hydrogen bubbles are one of the main sources of acoustic emission signals**, but there are significant differences in the responses of different materials. - **The acoustic emission signals of 17 - 4 PH are more active than those of 304 SS**, which may be related to its material structure and corrosion mechanism. - **Effectiveness of the small - scale electrode method**: By limiting the area of the exposed metal surface, the evolution process of a single corrosion pit can be studied more accurately, and multi - pit interference can be reduced. Through these studies, the author hopes to provide a deeper understanding and technical support for corrosion monitoring and evaluation.