Abstract:Almost 10 years ago, in an editorial published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), we celebrated an important event in the history of the journal, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of its founding. At that time, we included a representative figure, showing how much the prestige, popularity and value of the journal had increased since its origins, reaching a remarkable impact factor (IF) value of 2.15 in 2012. Who would have guess then that the IF of CCLM may have then reached a value exactly fourfold higher (i.e., 8.49) ten years later? Even more importantly, this increase significantly exceeds that of other journals in the Web of Science (WoS) category of "MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY", so that CCLM has now reached a podium position in this category, only surpassed by Clinical Chemistry (IF: 12.167) and Translational Research (IF: 10.171), while CCLM was only seventh in 2017. We would hence like to thank all those (authors, associate editors, members of the editorial board, editorial office, reviewers and readers), who have actively contributed to achieving such an outstanding success of CCLM. Almost 10 years ago, in an editorial published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), we celebrated an important event in the history of the journal, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of its founding [1]. At that time, we included a representative figure, showing how much the prestige, popularity and value of the journal had increased since its origins, reaching a remarkable impact factor (IF) value of 2.15 in 2012. Who would have guess then that the IF of CCLM may have then reached a value exactly fourfold higher (i.e., 8.49) ten years later? Even more importantly, this increase significantly exceeds that of other journals in the Web of Science (WoS) category of "MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY", as clearly shown in Figure 1, so that CCLM has now reached a podium position in this category, surpassed only by Clinical Chemistry (IF: 12.167) and Translational Research (IF: 10.171), while CCLM was only seventh in 2017. Trend of impact factor (IF) of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), median if of the web of science (WoS) category of "MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY" and the ratio between these two variables. The reasons for such a considerable increase in the IF of CCLM may be many, sometimes unpredictable and imponderable. The thoughtful awareness and proactive recognition that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) would have become "something" really serious has led to the publication of a series of articles in the early-2020 that, altogether, have certainly contributed to increasing the number of citations and thus the IF of the journal [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. But CCLM is not only COVID-19. Other important articles, which attracted many citations and contributed to increasing the IF, dealt with laboratory stewardship of bacterial infections [7], reference interval determination [8] and cancer biomarker discovery [9], in a long list of valuable contributions that combined original articles, up-to-date reviews, commentaries and letters to the editor. It is noteworthy that a detailed analysis of all articles that have contributed to this success has revealed - almost surprisingly - that nearly half of all highly cited papers were actually "original articles" rather than "reviews" or "opinion papers", two categories that have more than others contributed to attracting citations in the past. Another important aspect that needs to be emphasized here, is that this great improvement in the IF value is largely independent of self-cites, since only 7% (922 out of 12,899) are self-citations. Regarding the geographical origin of the articles, the top countries contributing to CCLM in the past three years were Italy, US, Germany, China and The Netherlands. Our sincere thanks go first and foremost to all our authors for their respectable papers, but we also wish to acknowledge the great work of all our reviewers, our board of associated editors, our editorial board and, last but not least, to the invaluable skills of our editorial office in Berlin. However, our thanks also go to all our readers, because we must always bear in mind that the ultimate mission of a medical journal is to disseminate scientific knowledge and to contribute to the improvement of (laboratory) medicine. It is also noteworthy that in the last 2 years CCLM has published a number of official documents of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], of which CCLM is the official journal. It has also published the s of EuroMedLab Munich 2021 [16], and a number of official papers from functional units of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) [17], [18], [19]. Now th -Abstract Truncated-

Comment on: A systematic approach of correct laboratory commissioning – special procedural features for medical laboratories using the example of specialised forms of care: supplement and update to the articles in J Lab Med 2014; 38(4): 179–205 and J Lab Med 2015; 39(4): 213–239

A systematic approach of correct laboratory commissioning: special procedural features for medical laboratories using the example of specialised forms of care

Benchmarking medical laboratory performance on a global scale

Revisiting the Environmental Impact of Inappropriate Clinical Laboratory Testing: A Comprehensive Overview of Sustainability, Economic, and Quality of Care Outcomes

Systematic Review of Large Language Models for Patient Care: Current Applications and Challenges

Clinical Chemistry and laboratory medicine: enjoying the present and assessing the future

A survey of patients’ views from eight European countries of interpretive support from Specialists in Laboratory Medicine

AWMF statement on medical services in laboratory diagnostics and pathology with regard to the IVDR

Navigation between EQA and sustainability

The Ethics of ChatGPT in Medicine and Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Large Language Models (LLMs)

Comment on Park et al. Lessons Learned from Translating Genome Sequencing to Clinical Routine: Understanding the Accuracy of a Diagnostic Pipeline. Genes 2024, 15, 136

A comprehensive survey of artificial intelligence adoption in European laboratory medicine: current utilization and prospects

Biological matrices, reagents and turnaround-time: the full-circle of artificial intelligence in the pre-analytical phase: comment on Turcic A, et al., Machine learning to optimize cerebrospinal fluid dilution for analysis of MRZH reaction. CCLM 2024;62:436–41

Improved implementation of medical tests - barriers and opportunities

Establishment of Review Criteria for a Hematology Analyzer with an Automated Review Function

Artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine: fundamental ethical issues and normative key-points

A vision to the future: value-based laboratory medicine

Influence of data visualisations on laboratorians' acceptance of method comparison studies

Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry?

Reference, calibration and referral laboratories – a look at current European provisions and beyond